NewsBite

Opinion

Michael Stutchbury

Treasurer v the RBA: Why Chalmers and Bullock are both right

Jim Chalmers says the economy is getting smashed by high interest, but it’s still running too hot for Michele Bullock’s central bank. The answer is simple: productivity.

Michael StutchburyEditor-at-large

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

How can the economy be “especially weak” as Jim Chalmers says but also too hot as Michele Bullock worries? Answer: it’s the supply side, stupid.

With productivity stalled, the economy just can’t grow any faster than the dawdle rate of the past year without risking more inflation.

Loading...
Michael Stutchbury is Editor-at-large. He is in his fourth decade of writing for and editing national newspapers. After nearly six years as editor of The Australian, he returned to the Financial Review as editor-in-chief (2011-2024). Email Michael at mstutchbury@afr.com

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Economy

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Policy

    Original URL: https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/treasurer-v-the-rba-why-chalmers-and-bullock-are-both-right-20240904-p5k7v2