NewsBite

2002 Cabinet Papers: Consensus ‘couldn’t be reached’ on post-9/11 security measures

The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet feared its inability to get state agreement on contentious new security measures in the wake of September 11.

Smoke pours from the twin towers of the World Trade Center after they were struck by hijacked commercial airplanes in New York on September 11, 2001. Picture: File
Smoke pours from the twin towers of the World Trade Center after they were struck by hijacked commercial airplanes in New York on September 11, 2001. Picture: File

The Howard government was forced to strengthen Australia’s counter-terrorism laws in the wake of September 11, including confirming the defence force would step in if the “terrorist threat has reached a level that is beyond the capacity of the civil authorities to resolve”.

With the public on heightened alert in 2002, cabinet papers released by the National Archives reveal the National Security Committee scrutinised various measures to bolster aviation security and border protection but could not reach a consensus.

“The proposals in the submission cover four different aspects of a strengthened approach to aviation security, border protection and response,” a cabinet document said. “These are: strengthening aircraft and airport security; identifying and intercepting terrorists before or at the border; improvements in identity verification and document integrity, and; improvements in investigation and response.

Firefighters form a human chain in a bid to rescue citizens from the rubble of World Trade Center in New York. Picture: File
Firefighters form a human chain in a bid to rescue citizens from the rubble of World Trade Center in New York. Picture: File

“The submission also includes provision for increased funding for the Attorney-General’s Department, AFP and AUSTRAC to enable them to continue to meet the need for increased security in the current year and beyond.”

There was also angst in March 2002 over what reforms would be achieved at the commonwealth-state summit on transnational crime and terrorism, with no agreement on the more contentious measures canvassed.

The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet wrote: “The department … believes the areas of likely agreement with the states and territories at the summit outlined in the submission fall well short of the commonwealth’s initial objectives … (as endorsed by cabinet in December 2001).

“At best, they could be portrayed as incremental improvements … in the areas of terrorism and in dealing with transnational crime. PM&C believes acceptance of such a limited outcome could expose the government to public criticism that it had failed to develop a credible national response to the new environment after the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks.”

Cabinet was faced with the increasing withdrawal of insurance cover for loss or damage caused by terrorist attacks, beginning in the aviation sector. The federal government was asked to intervene “as the withdrawal of cover means the terrorist risk passes to property and businesses owners and financiers”, then-treasurer Peter Costello wrote.

Cabinet agreed to put a suite of anti-terrorism legislation to parliament in March 2002. “Cabinet confirmed the maximum penalty under the proposed terrorism offences (to be enacted by the security legislation amendment (terrorism) bill 2002) be life imprisonment,” a February cabinet paper said.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/2002-cabinet-papers-consensus-couldnt-be-reached-on-post911-security-measures/news-story/5b3cd3adf7fd9fad31741c5437f10867