NewsBite

Climate change as a business opportunity: where to next?

The transition to carbon neutrality will require trillions. For the financial sector this means not just the opportunity to fund the future, but to profit from it.

The Australian economy’s contribution of about two per cent to global GDP suggests that our transition cost to net-zero will be in the low-single-digit trillions of dollars.
The Australian economy’s contribution of about two per cent to global GDP suggests that our transition cost to net-zero will be in the low-single-digit trillions of dollars.

For bankers all around the world, the realisation has dawned that climate change is a business opportunity, not just an existential risk. It’s hardly surprising: people with a nose for productive economic activity tend to start twitching when figures along the lines of $US125 trillion ($177 trillion) – the estimated cost of the global transition to carbon neutrality by 2050 – are bandied around.

On Commonwealth Bank numbers, the cost of the Australian net-zero transition will mirror the last great resources boom. Investment will peak at about 28 per cent of GDP in 2030 or thereabouts, which is about the same as it was in 2013 and one-third higher than its current level.

There is no doubt that the financial services industry, including the capital markets, has the capacity to fund this transition.

Commonwealth Bank institutional banking and markets head Andrew Hinchliff says there is a wall of funds looking to finance the transition, not just because it is the moral and ethical thing to do, but also for the business opportunity.

<b>OUT ON FRIDAY: </b><i>The List Green Power Players 2022. Don’t miss your copy of the 112-page inaugural edition</i>
OUT ON FRIDAY: The List Green Power Players 2022. Don’t miss your copy of the 112-page inaugural edition

“There’s a whole lot of problems associated with why we’re here at zero interest rates, but one of the beautiful things is that there’s a lot of very, very cheap money in the system so the world can more readily afford the capital expenditure for the necessary investment,” Hinchliff says.

ANZ Bank institutional group executive Mark Whelan spends most of his time with the big end of town and sees the opportunity as massive.

And regardless of how you think that (figure) breaks down, the money is heading there,” Whelan says.

“We see that already in a number of areas – the investors in discussions with us about assets we might be funding and how they can come and join us on that; their scrutiny over our lending practices; and importantly, the demand every time we issue a green bond or a green loan,” he said.

“These things are five to 10 times oversubscribed, so we know the appetite’s there and the commitment’s there; it’s just a matter of getting the projects under way.”

The $177 trillion ballpark estimate for the capital expenditure required to get us to net-zero by 2050 implies a run rate of $US32 trillion by the end of this decade. This means future investment will overwhelmingly be tilted towards decarbonisation, with combustion-engine vehicles, for example, replaced by electric vehicles, and agricultural practices reformed to produce lower emissions.

ANZ Bank institutional group executive Mark Whelan. Picture: Stuart McEvoy/The Australian.
ANZ Bank institutional group executive Mark Whelan. Picture: Stuart McEvoy/The Australian.

By the numbers

A report by the McKinsey & Co unit Vivid Economics for the United Nations breaks down the $US32 trillion annual figure into six key sectors – electricity ($US16 trillion), transport ($US5.4 trillion), buildings ($US5.2 trillion), industry ($US2.2 trillion), and low-emission fuels and agriculture and forestry ($US1.5 trillion each). To reach $US125 trillion by 2050, investment for decarbonisation needs to triple in 2021-25 compared with 2016-2020, then average $US4.5 trillion a year after 2026.

Vivid says private actors can provide 70 per cent of the financing required until the end of the decade, offering “huge” opportunities for investors.

Sonya Sawtell-Rickson, chief investment officer at the $66 billion industry super fund HESTA, says about nine per cent of the fund’s assets are currently invested in low-carbon opportunities. Among them are Taiwan-based Gogoro, a provider of electric scooters, replaceable battery packs and battery swapping stations, and Convoy, a digital freight network to connect shippers to carriers, moving hundreds of thousands of truckloads and eliminating carbon waste.

Sonia Sawtell-Rickson Chief investment officer, HESTA
Sonia Sawtell-Rickson Chief investment officer, HESTA

“We want to accelerate the transition (to a green economy) by investing in clean technology, renewable energy and so on,” Sawtell-Rickson says. “But a significant bulk of capital will go to ‘brown’ companies becoming more green.”

Australia’s Macquarie Group, meanwhile, has developed potentially world-leading green capabilities in the sector, according to rival investment bank Morgan Stanley.

Analyst Andrei Stadnik said in a recent report that Macquarie was now a vertically integrated, private-markets asset manager and developer, with potentially the world’s best green capabilities among alternative asset managers.

Macquarie, he said, was perfectly positioned for the green revolution, with operations spanning finance and development, advice, infrastructure management and operation, and research and trading in emissions allowances and carbon offsets.

The scope of its business was likely to result in a “green premium multiple or a lower cost of capital”.

While Vivid’s report doesn’t break down the $US125 trillion figure into individual countries, the Australian economy’s contribution of about two per cent to global GDP suggests that our transition cost to net-zero will be in the low-single-digit trillions of dollars.

Whelan is not so much concerned with a lack of available finance as the quality of the projects and how quickly the required technology can operate at scale.

“How quickly does green hydrogen become a reality at scale? How quickly do electric vehicles take hold and the infrastructure surrounding them?” Whelan asks.

“It’s a bit like solar and wind 15 years ago – there were some really bad projects in there and there were some good ones. A lot of money wants to go into these assets but you’ve still got to pick wisely what you do and how much you put into it.

“One of the things we do with new opportunities in the green space is that we look closely at the sponsors. That’s the way you can stay safe as a financier.”

Future proofing

The Morrison government’s net-zero emissions plan by 2050 identifies a handful of priority industries, starting with Australia’s highest emitting sector – electricity generation – responsible for almost 34 per cent of our emissions in 2019.

After that comes industry, mining and manufacturing, residential and commercial buildings, transport and agriculture and land.

Ultra-low emissions from electricity generation are key because it enables other sectors including transport, buildings and industry to decarbonise by switching to clean electricity, which can also be used to produce clean fuels such as clean hydrogen. Low emissions electricity will also enable much of the economy to shift to low emissions pathways, with latest projections suggesting the share of renewable generation will lift from 23 per cent in 2020 to 61 per cent by 2030.

The transition to renewables won’t be cheap. On Westpac numbers, the tab for retiring coal-fired power generation in Australia in the next decade will be about $100 billion. Then throw in an extra $50 billion for the poles and wires to carry the higher renewables load.

As Whelan warns, however, the current mismatch between supply of suitable projects and pool of funds already available raises the risk of bad actors seeking an underserved role in the decarbonisation supercycle.

Greenwashing, where promoters burnish the green credentials of dubious projects, is already a problem.

Westpac institutional boss Anthony Miller says lenders can start to manage, compare and prioritise projects once there’s an agreed taxonomy.

“When people say this is a green bond or this is sustainable-linked financing, you want to make sure there’s a lot more consistency in that language and what definitions people are using,” Miller says.

“That’s the kind of stuff that really allows us to get in and deliver.”

“It’s a bit like solar and wind 15 years ago – there were some really bad projects in there and there were some good ones. A lot of money wants to go into these assets but you’ve still got to pick wisely.”

OUT THIS FRIDAY: The List - Green Power Players 2022. Don’t miss your copy of the 112-page inaugural edition.

Read related topics:Climate Change

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/renewable-energy-economy/climate-change-as-a-business-opportunity-where-to-next/news-story/043f22d8c8c3993178dc9c137e01e405