Trial of former Wheat Board chairman Trevor Flugge points to bigger issues
The law is too complicated for criminal convictions, and companies have no reason to clean up their act.
When a trial involving a former chairman of the Australian Wheat Board, Trevor Flugge, over payments allegedly made to the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein started in Melbourne last week, international observers might have thought Australia was finally making some progress in enforcing anti-corruption laws.
But a closer look at the proceedings reveals that this is a civil case brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission alleging breaches of Flugge's duties as a director. Although the 2005 Cole Inquiry heard that the AWB transferred $US225 million to the Hussein government, all criminal proceedings were dropped long ago, with a major barrier being the complicated law in this area.
Subscribe to gift this article
Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.
Subscribe nowAlready a subscriber?
Introducing your Newsfeed
Follow the topics, people and companies that matter to you.
Find out moreRead More
Latest In Politics
Fetching latest articles