Couple calls for testing regime change after double dose of coronavirus hell
The testing procedure for coronavirus-positive people coming out of isolation needs to change according to a couple who tested positive to the virus for a second time.
Coronavirus
Don't miss out on the headlines from Coronavirus. Followed categories will be added to My News.
A COUPLE who were passengers on a coronavirus-stricken cruise ship have revealed their horror ordeal of testing positive to the deadly virus then being cleared, only to be struck down again.
Jason Parsell and fiancee Danielle Hanson, of Blackmans Bay, say their experience with COVID-19 shows all positive cases should be retested to make certain the virus has left their system before they come out of isolation.
Under national guidelines, only those who work in health and aged care who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 are being tested to clear them of the disease.
Mr Parsell, Ms Hanson and their two children Grace, 3, and Dominic, 1, were among a group of Tasmanian travellers on the Voyager of the Seas cruise ship early last month.
The ship visited New Caledonia and Vanuatu before returning to Sydney. After the family returned home, Ms Hanson fell ill and was diagnosed with the virus on March 25.
Mr Parsell also tested positive despite being asymptomatic.
After Ms Hanson’s condition improved, she was told by health officials on April 3 her isolation was over.
But just over a week later, Ms Hanson again became unwell. She was tested for a second time on April 12 and the result again came back positive.
Mr Parsell was reclassed as a positive case as he was also showing a recurrence of symptoms.
Both children have been tested multiple times but are negative to COVID-19.
In the time between isolation ending and the second positive test, the couple had gone to the supermarket and pharmacy for essential reasons, not knowing they still had the virus.
They did not visit family or friends, nor has Ms Hanson returned to work, which is considered essential under current restrictions.
But they are racked with guilt, despite not committing any breach of the rules.
“I feel absolutely terrible,” Ms Hanson said.
“We don’t want to scare people, we want people to be aware there is a flaw in the system that needs to be addressed.
“We feel it can’t be heard in any other way and hopefully people will agree that the testing procedure needs to change before clearance.”
Ms Hanson said when her current isolation period ends, she will demand to be retested.
They have also contacted Health Minister Sarah Courtney’s office asking if the testing process will be changed.
Director of Public Health Mark Veitch said positive cases were isolated for at least 10 days after their symptoms have started and a further three days after they have ceased.
Dr Veitch said workers in health or aged care were required to have two clear tests for coronavirus at least 24 hours apart.
“There’s no requirement to test people who aren’t going into vulnerable occupations after they recover from their illness and this is based on national guidance and international practice,” Dr Veitch said.
A Public Health Services spokesman said testing could detect the virus for a time after people have recovered from the infection and are beyond the required isolation period.
He said such people were unlikely to pose an infectious risk, and that the greatest risk of spreading the virus occurred early in the illness when people have acute symptoms.
Ms Courtney said testing was based on national guidelines, which were reviewed regularly by experts.