The CCC successfully appeals the Queensland Police Service’s in-house ruling

A CCC appeal heard the Darling Downs police officer accidentally turned on his bodyworn camera which then recorded his “detailed and explicit” monologue about sex with a named child.

A Darling Downs police officer had his probation period extended to three years after an appeal by the Crime and Corruption Commission.

The Crime and Corruption Commission has won an appeal against a Darling Downs police officer who was caught on bodycam talking about sex with a child, with the corruption watchdog arguing his initial punishment was inadequate.

The officer, who was based in the Southern Downs at the time, took some prescription medication then drove a marked police car while armed on April 4, 2017.

The Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal heard he accidentally activated his bodyworn camera.

It recorded the officer talking to himself about the medication affecting his driving and about “removing another person’s prescription medication without their consent”.

The tribunal heard the recording captured the officer “disclosing sexual ideation regarding wanting to have sex and commit sexual acts” with a named child.

His speech was slurred and he appeared to drive aimlessly, at one point looking and talking about his thumb. The tribunal reviewed material from the officer’s QPS disciplinary hearing where Assistant Commissioner Maurice Carless described this sexually explicit monologue as “disturbing”.

“They are detailed and explicit, and if acted upon, could constitute a life imprisonment offence,” he said.

The tribunal heard the QPS investigators twice interviewed the child to determine if the officer had assaulted her.

The tribunal also heard of unrelated matters where the officer accessed the police database without an official purpose between March 30, 2016 and June 6, 2019. The tribunal heard this may have led to a person of interest getting information about planned drug raids, via the officer’s wife.

In the officer’s defence, the tribunal heard he had an untarnished record prior to these offences, and that he described his behaviour as “disgusting and disgraceful” and that it damaged his reputation and that of the QPS.

The tribunal heard the officer was initially placed on a one-year probationary period after a QPS disciplinary hearing on June 16, 2020.

The CCC argued this sanction was “not sufficiently strong enough to make clear that such conduct is unacceptable within the QPS”.

The tribunal agreed, and on September 23 it extended the probation period to three years. During this time the officer must engage in regular mental health treatments and not commit misconduct.

If he breaches the order he must show cause as to why he should be allowed to keep his badge.