Voicing concerns about lasting constitutional change
A legislated Indigenous voice should not be considered a failure by the Albanese government but potentially be on the list of options.
A legislated Indigenous voice should not be considered a failure by the Albanese government but potentially be on the list of options.
The Albanese government is in danger of repeating history by failing to explain the ramifications of the changes.
One reader asks: Is this an attitude that we might expect should the Yes option win?
Backing and funding the Yes campaign for the Indigenous voice suggests they have lost focus on working for their shareholders.
Unless the government and in particular its main voice champion, the Prime Minister, clarify the obscurities, then the referendum is doomed to failure.
An Indigenous voice to parliament will fail to represent the diverse views of Aboriginal Australians or improve conditions, the architect of the Northern Territory intervention, Mal Brough, has warned.
And those seeking answers should not be shut out and dismissed as racists.
The closing the gap problem needs to be tackled at grassroots, not in Canberra.
In raising the spectre of eugenics, Marcia Langton goes for the jugular against a Celtic Walpiri woman who happens to be a No vote supporter.
First Nations people have and should always have a special place in Australia.
An examination of details of the proposal finds much devil in it.
And a stumbling block for non-Indigenous Australians is that the vast bulk of them don’t have Indigenous friends.
Referendum supporters need to satisfy voter concerns about whether a voice to parliament will improve the lives of Indigenous Australians in remote communities.
Warren Mundine, an outspoken critic of the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament, says he would actively support the concept if next year’s referendum is passed.
Our parliament is currently representative of us all, let us not change what is not broken.
The Constitution derives its legitimacy from the people so they must be fully informed.
in 1967 Australians voted vehemently yes to a Constitution that treated all Australians the same. Now the voice advocates want us to repeal that democratic decision and treat some Australians differently.
Let’s not fear failure but feel confident in our ability to conduct a passionate yet civil debate on the Indigenous voice.
There may be some common ground in the wake of the Uluru statement but it seems unanimity is a vain hope.
Conservative Aboriginal leaders and Greens hold talks over their opposition to a referendum on an Indigenous voice.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/topics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament/page/63