Don’t confuse ‘legally sound’ for logically sound on voice
The shenanigans over the proposed Indigenous voice provide a fascinating case study of how to, or how not to, make the case for constitutional change.
The shenanigans over the proposed Indigenous voice provide a fascinating case study of how to, or how not to, make the case for constitutional change.
Welcome to Country rituals apparently have been performed for millennia, but they’re remarkably adaptive to Western rent-seeking practices.
Lidia Thorpe has used her senate platform to silence opponents and stoke division, while taking cheap shots at fellow parliamentarians, Indigenous leaders and law enforcement.
Given Kevin Rudd’s fervent belief he was wrongfully denied a nomination for UN secretary-general, he would regard his present position nothing more than a sop.
A recent Newspoll revealed 38 per cent, or 9.9 million Australians, would vote ‘no’ in the upcoming Indigenous voice to parliament referendum. It should come as no surprise.
It’s easy to imagine how the ABC’s stable of activist broadcasters will take to sessions on balance over the voice referendum …
Jim Chalmers is a visionary. Initially I was unconvinced of the genius he demonstrated in his 6000-word essay. But the Treasurer is not merely prescient: he is a prophet, albeit a self-fulfilling one.
The real ‘problem’ with Roald Dahl is he’s a dead white male whose books remain hugely popular. It’s a progressive conundrum in the literary world.
Members of the Gullible Nation donated to her campaign, handed out pamphlets and threw little goat cheese soirées. Only after the election did Lidia Thorpe reveal her real purpose.
We must be alert to those among us who resist what is a modest proposal to enshrine identity politics in our constitution.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/the-mocker/page/7