Domestic tensions over Mideast test cohesion of democracy
There’s a new urgency to refocus our attention on that age-old question: what are the ‘objects of love’ sufficient to bind our society?
There’s a new urgency to refocus our attention on that age-old question: what are the ‘objects of love’ sufficient to bind our society?
The deep societal shifts driving the fractious religious freedom debate remain unrelenting. They are likely to press both major parties to declare commitments in the lead-up to the next election.
Terms of reference for the report on religious schools was more limited than Labor’s pledge.
State ‘morals’ limitations on faith-based education institutions run counter to the most basic protection of the family unit against state indoctrination.
It is ludicrous to suggest that religious schools be required to hire staff who do not share their religious beliefs or who have no religious beliefs.
As the hurtful irony of the Essendon and Manly sagas has shown, our tolerant society is broken.
The Religious Discrimination Bill offers sound protections and deserves bipartisan support.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/mark-fowler