A judge has ordered Tesla CEO Elon Musk to stand trial over his comments about a Thai cave rescuer
Tesla CEO Elon Musk will face trail in the US over bizarre comments he made about one of the divers who saved 12 boys from a flooded cave in Thailand.
A federal judge has cleared the way for a defamation trial against Elon Musk over his comments about a British cave rescuer after rejecting key arguments from the Tesla chief.
US judge Stephen Wilson ordered a trial to begin December 3 in Los Angeles in the case that centres on Musk’s tweets in a disagreement connected to the rescue of 12 boys from a cave in Thailand in July 2018.
Mr Musk called Vernon Unsworth “pedo guy” after Mr Unsworth, who helped with the rescue, ridiculed Mr Musk’s proposal to build a mini-submarine during the crisis as a “PR stunt”.
The judge rejected Mr Musk’s argument that the term “pedo guy” was a common insult and would be seen as an opinion and not a statement of fact.
The judge rejected Mr Musk’s argument that the term “pedo guy” was a common insult and would be seen as an opinion and not a statement of fact.
Judge Wilson said some of Mr Musk’s subsequent statements suggested he believed the charge about Mr Unsworth to be true, which has “created a genuine dispute over the meaning of Defendant’s tweets” that “must be resolved by a jury”.
Mr Unsworth has denied being a paedophile.
Judge Wilson accepted aspects of Mr Musk’s argument that Mr Unsworth was a “limited public figure” who had voluntarily injected himself into the public debate about how to save the boys.
To win a defamation case in US courts, public figures like celebrities must show actual malice on the part of the person making a false statement, as opposed to the lower standard of negligence.
But Judge Wilson ruled Mr Musk should not be shielded him from a defamation lawsuit because the allegation of paedophilia was not connected to the debate about how to save the boys.
MORE NEWS
Witness ties Trump to ‘quid pro quo’
Andrew stepping back from royal duties
Aussies battle it out for Grammys
“To allow criticism into every aspect of a plaintiff’s life simply because he chose to get involved in a limited issue would render him an all-purpose public figure,” Judge Wilson wrote in a decision earlier this week.
“For defendant’s comments to relate to Plaintiff’s participation in public controversies, there must be some relationship between paedophilia and the rescue or the subs - there is simply no credible connection here.”
Alex Spiro, an lawyer representing Mr Musk, said in an email that “we look forward to the trial”.