NewsBite

Rowland wins some, loses more in gambling advertising debate

Rowland wins some, loses more in gambling advertising debate

Pointless non-disclosure agreements, an agitated backbench – miscalculations have marred long-overdue reform to wagering advertising rules.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Sitting down at a conference table in a windowless room in Parliament House late on Thursday, Gambling Reform Alliance chief advocate Tim Costello was hoping for answers.

It had been two weeks since AFR Weekend reported that media companies, bookmakers and the AFL and NRL – the two players with the most clout – had been summoned to secret briefings on the government’s proposed response to a bipartisan parliamentary inquiry recommendation to ban all gambling ads.

Loading...

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Ronald Mizen
Ronald MizenPolitical correspondentRonald Mizen is the Financial Review’s political correspondent, reporting from the press gallery at Parliament House, Canberra. Connect with Ronald on Twitter. Email Ronald at ronald.mizen@afr.com
Sam Buckingham-Jones
Sam Buckingham-JonesMedia and marketing reporterSam Buckingham-Jones is the media and marketing reporter at The Australian Financial Review. Connect with Sam on Twitter.

Latest In Federal

Fetching latest articles

Original URL: https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/rowland-wins-some-loses-more-in-gambling-advertising-debate-20240815-p5k2le