Opinion
The big AUKUS question that Albanese has yet to answer
Paul Keating is insouciant about China’s muscle and dismissive of Taiwan’s democracy. But he has changed the national debate about the submarine deal.
Sam RoggeveenContributorLike a depth charge fired from a destroyer, Paul Keating’s intervention at the National Press Club on Wednesday forced the big AUKUS questions to the surface.
Keating used plain words such as “invasion” and “threat”, whereas the government has said almost nothing about why we are making this $268-368 billion investment. It prefers to talk about economic spin-offs.
Subscribe to gift this article
Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.
Subscribe nowAlready a subscriber?
Latest In Foreign affairs & security
Fetching latest articles