NewsBite

Opinion

Anthony Dillon

Why the Voice went unheard at the referendum

The proposed constitutional change was based on an ideology of Indigenous separatism. It is not the way to get the progress that First Nations people so clearly need.

Anthony DillonIndigenous affairs expert

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

On the anniversary of the Voice referendum, it is timely to reflect on what we have learnt and give some thought for how best to help Indigenous Australians.

I don’t intend to do a full postmortem on why it failed, other than to say it was simply wrong to assume that Indigenous Australians somehow lack a voice on matters that affect them. Instead, I am writing this because I believe the idea of a Voice-like proposal is still relevant a year after the referendum, for reasons I discuss here.

Loading...
Anthony Dillon is an honorary fellow of the Australian Catholic University.

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Economy

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Policy

    Original URL: https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/why-the-voice-went-unheard-at-the-referendum-20241002-p5kf5g