Cyclist injured in Blairgowrie crash with Daniel Andrews pockets secret out-of-court settlement

A major law firm has agreed to hand over several hundreds of thousands of dollars to the cyclist struck by Daniel Andrews’ SUV, weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin.

A cyclist struck by Daniel and Catherine Andrews’ SUV has pocketed a secret out-of-court settlement worth several hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The Herald Sun can reveal major law firm Slater & Gordon has agreed to hand over the massive payout to Ryan Meuleman just weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin.

Ryan’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed a confidential settlement had been reached over the family’s claim that the Labor-aligned law firm failed to act in his best interests in the aftermath of the crash.

“In the end he received an offer too good to refuse,” Mr Clarke said.

“I am pleased for Ryan. He now has closure in relation to his claim against Slater & Gordon.”

Slater & Gordon is handing over a payout to Ryan Meuleman weeks before a trial was due to begin. Picture: Jake Nowakowski

But the “bike boy” dispute is far from over, with the Meuleman family moving to pursue the former Victorian premier and his wife directly through the courts over the near-fatal 2013 crash.

“I’ve been telling the truth since I was 15 years old,” Ryan said.

“The people in the car are next. They shouldn’t get away with lying either.”

Ryan’s father, Peter Meuleman, said: “My son has been called a liar since he was a teenager. Can you imagine what that does to a boy?

“The truth will now come out in the lawsuits against Andrews and his wife for defamation. Ryan isn’t stopping.

“Damning evidence has been covered up and ignored for a decade. It was always there to find.”

Mr and Mrs Andrews were served with concerns notices in January - separate to the Slater & Gordon case - over statements they made following the release of a damning review of the crash conducted by the state’s former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations Dr Raymond Shuey.

Ryan Meuleman was 15 when he was hit by the Andrews’ car in Blairgowrie in 2013, suffering serious internal injuries. Picture: supplied

Ryan Meuleman in hospital after being knocked down off his bike by a car in Blairgowrie

The Shuey review found that the Andrews’ Ford Territory was “travelling at speed” – on the wrong side of the road – and that Victoria Police had engaged in “an overt cover-up to avoid implicating a political figure in a life-threatening” incident.

It concluded that the police investigation, which supported the Andrews’ version of events, was “deeply flawed”, “unfounded” and “contrary to the available evidence”.

In a joint statement issued after the release of Dr Shuey’s review, the Andrews’ said: “This so-called report was commissioned by lawyers on behalf of their clients who are seeking money through the courts by suing their former lawyers.

“We are not a party to this legal action. We did nothing wrong. This matter has already been comprehensively and independently investigated and closed by Victoria Police and integrity agencies.

Daniel Andrews and wife Catherine spoke out against the Meulemans for a second time last November after audio of the former premier’s triple-zero call from the scene of the crash was released. Picture: NCA NewsWire

“We will not dignify these appalling conspiracy theories by commenting further at this time.”

The Andrews’ spoke out against the Meulemans for a second time last November after audio of the former premier’s triple-zero call from the scene of the crash was released in which he tells an emergency services operator: “we’ve hit him.”

Ryan was 15 when he was hit by the Andrews’ car in Blairgowrie in January 2013, suffering serious internal injuries.

Slater & Gordon was accused of failing to conduct “a full and proper investigation into the circumstances” of the collision and failing to act in Ryan’s best interests and breaching its duty of care and obligations to him when negotiating his $80,000 TAC compensation payout.

Ryan has always insisted that the car was “speeding” and “seemed to come out of nowhere” when he was hit 27m on from the Melbourne Rd and Ridley St intersection, contradicting the ­Andrews’ claims they came to a “complete stop” and “turned right from a stationary ­position” just ­“moments” before the collision.

Police photographs uncovered by the Herald Sun in November 2022 showed extensive damage to the front of the Andrews’ car and its windscreen.

Dr Shuey’s report concluded that the version of events provided by Daniel and Catherine Andrews was “considered improbable and implausible”. Picture: supplied

The Herald Sun later revealed an Ambulance Victoria report detailed how the Andrews’ SUV “struck” Ryan while “travelling at 40 to 60kmph”.

Dr Shuey’s report concluded that “the version (of events) as provided by Catherine and Daniel Andrews” was “considered improbable and implausible”

“The truth is still outstanding. It is most probable that the vehicle undertook a sweep turn at speed, cutting the corner and still on the incorrect side of the roadway … when the collision occurred,” his review said.

Catherine Andrews has always maintained that she was behind the wheel at the time of the crash, but was not breath tested.

Ryan was represented by multiple law firms throughout the Supreme Court dispute, while top law firm Minter Ellison acted for Slater & Gordon.

Originally published as Cyclist injured in Blairgowrie crash with Daniel Andrews pockets secret out-of-court settlement