Why wasn’t childcare abuse a focus of the royal commission?
The matter of child safety while in institutional childcare should have been leading the news bulletins and on the front pages at least a decade ago.
It’s an unusual phenomenon when a senior politician acknowledges that they could have done better. But such an instance occurred on July 3 when federal Education Minister Jason Clare was interviewed by ABC TV 7.30 presenter Sarah Ferguson. At issue was the topic of safety in childcare and early education.
The interview took place in the aftermath of a man being charged with serious child sex offences while working at a childcare centre in Melbourne.
Ferguson commented on a report that said “if you look across all data, at least one report a day of sexual misconduct comes from childcare centres”.
In response to a question as to what he had been doing for the past three years, Clare replied: “The bottom line is that ministers haven’t been doing enough, fast enough.” Asked whether that included him, Clare responded: “Including me.”
To be fair to Clare, he is supposed to be advised by public servants concerning such matters and should not be expected to take responsibility for acts of commission or omission in childcare centres. Moreover, he is the federal minister in an area where the states and territories have specific responsibilities.
But there is a bigger issue, which is unfashionable to raise. Namely, the matter of child safety while in institutional childcare should have been leading the news bulletins and on the front pages at least a decade ago.
On November 12, 2012, prime minister Julia Gillard – with the support of opposition leader Tony Abbott and in co-operation with the states and territories – set up the Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. It was headed by Justice Peter McClellan KC, who was assisted by five other commissioners. The royal commission had a maximum budget of $372.8m, of which $342m was spent. It employed about 300 staff at any one time. McClellan presented his final report to the governor-general on December 15, 2017.
All up, the royal commission produced 17 reports, conducted 57 case studies and made 409 recommendations. And what did McClellan and his fellow commissioners have to say about childcare and early education?
Well, not much at all. It is doubtful if its lengthy reports were read by many, even though they contained considerable valuable information. Such work, primarily drafted by public servants, does not compelling reading make.
McClellan became a public figure, along with counsel assisting Gail Furness SC, because of the royal commission’s case studies, which involved hearings. They were open to the media and filmed, and transcripts (with detailed indexes) were available online the day after each proceeding.
At Gillard’s media conference, the first question turned on whether the royal commission “would look beyond the Catholic Church to all institutions”. She replied, “absolutely correct”. However, she told journalists she had phoned Cardinal George Pell as a courtesy before the announcement. No other leader, religious or otherwise, was mentioned.
It soon became apparent that the focus of the royal commission was the Catholic Church and, to a lesser extent, the Anglican Church. Indeed, Pell spent about 36 hours giving evidence. The second longest evidence given was by an Anglican archbishop.
The problem here was that, to many Australians, the royal commission appeared to be focused on the Christian churches, particularly the Catholic Church.
Writing in these pages on August 19, 2017, Greg Craven (a former crown counsel to the Victorian government) commented that “the obsession of the royal commission with ‘the Catholics’ has all but crowded out the scrutiny of other institutions”. He added: “I have some insight into historic child abuse within Australian public institutions. State governments collectively are breathing a sigh of relief the commission’s focus on church abuse largely has let them off the hook.”
And so it came to pass. Of the royal commission’s 57 case studies, more than a quarter were into Catholic institutions and many of the rest into other Christian institutions. There was not one case study into an existing government school. When I wrote this in my column previously, McClellan replied that it was “not correct” to say the royal commission had failed to have a public hearing into a state school.
He said “the royal commission did examine three NSW public schools in a case study”. What McClellan did not point out was that this was a very brief report into sexual abuse in government schools by students against other students. This did not involve pedophilia. I wrote to McClellan, by post and email, about this. He did not respond.
The end of the royal commission led to many complaints from those who had attended government schools. Commissions of inquiry have been held into historical child sexual abuse by adults in Tasmania and Victoria. The latter inquiry is yet to be finalised.
Recently in NSW, a former teacher at Vaucluse Primary, a government school in Sydney, was convicted of historical child sexual abuse. The NSW government had yet to set up an inquiry into pedophilia within its Department of Education schools, despite the evidence of considerable offending having taken place.
I have been advised that a parent of a (then) child who was educated at Vaucluse Primary approached the royal commission but it declined to take up his matter. I have written elsewhere about a teacher who approached the royal commission about a pedophile teacher at a government school in Melbourne. No action was taken. Both cases involved teachers who had previously been accused or convicted of child sexual abuse and whose cases were reported in the media. But the royal commission didn’t notice. Yet most Australian students attend government schools.
As far as I can determine, the royal commission did not do a case study into childcare institutions, although it did mention child safety in its reports. If historical child sexual abuse in childcare institutions had become a public issue around the time the royal commission was established, Australians would not have been so shocked by the recent appalling accounts. And Clare would have no genuine excuse for failing to focus on these crimes.
More Coverage
High-flying Merz soars above Germany’s old rules
The new German Chancellor waited two decades for his colleague and great rival Angela Merkel to depart the scene. The more conservative Merz is finally “the boss” and free to put his more muscular stamp on Germany.
Women’s rights vs trans rights: how I was drawn into a very modern battle
When Sall Grover’s online platform was flooded with trans activists, she asked herself this question: as profoundly fraught as the trans issue is, why should women’s rights come second?