‘Xi Jinping gets a pass but they gang up on the Queen’
“Ah, academia … The gift that keeps on giving. Note none of them would ever have the courage to comment on Xi Jinping, but they are happy to gang up on the Queen.”
Gary said:
“Not too sure how you could call the Queen a colonial oppressor. A quick check of history reveals that she took on the role in 1952 and a program of rapid decolonisation began a few years later. Also around the same time millions from these former colonies decided to move to the UK, presumably because they say a better and more equitable future there.”
Philip fumed:
“Thank you, The Mocker, for puncturing some inflated egos. I note in Senator Thorpe’s twit (I presume that’s what you call a message on Twitter) that she opines ‘I’ve seen anger and disbelief from First Nations people at the glorification of our oppressor.’ Would she be kind enough to tell us how exactly her people are oppressed?”
Anne was aghast:
“The dignity of the Royal family this last week by comparison with those in this country who would have us become a republic would prevent me from ever voting for any of those who would wish to take her place. Their behaviour is crass, disrespectful, and completely without a thought for those suffering from the most severe loss of a family member.”
Marion agreed:
“Dignity is something the republican wannabees of this country seem unable to achieve.”
Avvisade quoted:
“ ‘Anya, incidentally, also identifies as a feminist and repeatedly calls out toxic masculinity.’ ‘Tell me if I’m wrong, but her comments about the Queen seemed extremely toxic.”
Peter opined:
“For the Left the late Queen is a villain, culpable for the crimes of Empire. In the US the Democrat left and their mouthpiece The New York Times brought us the 1619 Project and Critical Race Theory.
“Consider the following, then ask yourself how the view expressed could come from a US university history professor. Uju Anya, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University tweeted that ‘the chief monarch of a thieving raping genocidal empire is finally dying’ when news broke of the Queen’s ill health, adding, ‘may her pain be excruciating’.”
Unrepresented Canberrean:
“Dear Mocker, what an easy target you have been given this week. The woke just line themselves up like lemmings before a cliff. It is hard to believe that there can be any more hypocritical individuals than the self proclaimed victims who happily accept the coin of the taxpayer.”
Chrissy’s challenge:
“If any nationality offers these sentiments, then go back to basics, go bush and live off the land … do not expect taxpayer funding or assistance, don’t use any manufactured item, fuels or transport. We are one nation Australia, whether born overseas, born here, born now or 50 years or more ago.”
Michael said:
“Warren Mundine’s reply above to IndigenousX / Sandy O’Sullivan absolutely nails it. From the comfort of the university lecture theatre, any fool can show their hypocrisy and, dare I say it, ‘privilege’.”
KeithW said:
“I find it hypocritical that indigenous activists demand that we pay unreserved homage to their elders past and present but demand a right to loudly rejoice at the death or suffering of an elder of the culture from which a great number of Australians are descended. I am sure many past Indigenous elders were good people, but just like all humans, I am sure many of them were bad people or at least a mixture of good and bad. Why should we be forced to revere these people who we do not even know and cannot know of their deeds good or bad.”
iVote noted:
“Going by this column, it appears that many indigenous spokespersons already have a voice, and are already using it, very loud and very clear.”
RobX went the fully Monty:
“Apart from the roads, the aqueducts, freedom of speech, universities and lucrative professorships, what have the colonists ever done for us?”
Lo went high:
“And this ailing 96-year-old woman continued to carry out her duties to within hours of her death. Why are we so accepting, so tolerant of such appalling bad manners? The standards of polite behaviour are getting lower every year.”
Kristin’s comment:
“Maybe these activists should de-couple themselves from modern society and go and live like their pre colonial forebears.”
Jeem was done:
“Honestly, I’m genuinely tired of those overblown colonisation and racial comments by the vocal minority. In particular, academia, most of whom have never worked in the real world. What is it, something to the effect that if you can’t do, teach. These people are removed from reality.”
-
The Australian Republic Movement will campaign for the removal of the British monarchy on currency, as the Albanese government leaves open the option of replacing Queen Elizabeth II on the $5 note with a national icon. MJ from Sydney said:
“The Australian Republic Movement never misses an opportunity to look both arrogant and insensitive.”
Meh said Robert:
“Personally I don’t care whose image is on the currency, my only concern is I have some of it in my wallet.”
Chris said:
“Oh yes, let’s waste everyone’s time on arguing over who else’s bonce should be on the coinage. Nobody really cares, just put the King on like always and get on with the important things.”
Emmie’s analysis:
“Listen carefully to Albanese’s response when questioned as to whether he would have ER11 removed from the $5 note. Classic weasel words, he so obviously left himself the option of removing it. Watch for the Albanese ‘switch’ after his (unnecessary and very fishy) day of … well the name he gives it keeps changing, wonder if the ALP might be working their focus groups overtime …now, a day of ’national remembrance’. Albanese needs to be careful, weasel words erode trust.”
Pat was peeved:
“FitzSimons is a devoted attention seeker. The Queen never had to seek attention. Any talk of becoming a republic within a week of the Queen’s death, is, at best crass, at worse disrespectful. Neither FitzSimons, nor Bandt, would know the meaning of respect.”
I think you meant “republic”.
Mark flipped it:
“Whatever your point of view there is no doubting that the Queen did a great job and will be a tough act to follow. Republicans should want Charles’ head on the currency. If he is as unpopular as some people think then it would advance their cause.”
Bob Sacamano:
“I think being a millionaire with a harbourside mansion is a prerequisite of membership of the Republican movement. Their own functions cost hundreds of dollars and would be out of reach for the average person. Ironic for a group of people who pretend to be tribunes of the people in railing against unearned privilege!
“It’s not that they’re against privilege or people being elevated as betters, it’s just that their born-to-rule mentality convinces them that they’re the ones that should be so honoured.
Meanwhile, our King – like his mother before him – has pledged himself for a life of public service and duty. He will achieve, like her, more for the public good in a single year than any of these elite republicans will in a lifetime.”
Warren had the answer:
“Put Red Bandana Fitzy on one side and a Galah on the other.”
-
Swiss champion Roger Federer has confirmed he will retire from tennis after one more tournament. Federer said that his body had effectively told him it was time to bring the curtain down. RMcC bid a fond farewell:
“I feel privileged to have been a spectator of this sport for all of Federer’s time in tennis and I wish him a happy and well deserved retirement from competitive tennis. Additionally, I am privileged to have watched Nadal during those years. They are two of the most gracious players the sport has produced.”
Carmen said:
“A role model for all, athletically gifted and a true champion. His humility sets him above other recently retired players.”
Kara M joked:
“He may have been gifted a cow from his adoring Swiss, but to me he’ll always be the GOAT. A champion, a gentleman and it seems a loving family man.”
Anthony said:
“Federer is a legend player of tennis, And what a beautiful tribute Nadal has given to him of Federer’s retirement. Many could learn from that message about how to display affection even to a sporting rival.”
David said:
“An exemplary champion. In retirement, as in his play, he showed class and humility.”
Last word to Peter:
“In some respects, it’s not how many you won, but how you won them. In Roger’s case, he was a true sportsman in every sense of the word, brilliant, tenacious, with a never-say-die attitude and a thorough gentleman. Arguably the best role model for a tennis player, sadly there have been and still are some severely lacking in the gentleman capacity. Being a gentleman isn’t a gift, it’s an obligation.”
-
Each Friday the cream of your views on the news rises and we honour the voices that made the debate great. To boost your chances of being featured, please be pertinent, pithy and preferably make a point. Solid arguments, original ideas, sparkling prose, rapier wit and rhetorical flourishes may count in your favour. Civility is essential. Comments may be edited for length.
Human existence does not end in the tomb
Pope Francis wanted a simple funeral, and his coffin fitted the bill.
Serious security dangers marginalised in campaign
At some stage the nation could face a brutal reckoning over defence. There is a manifest need for more assets. Policies to lift productivity and revenue are needed to pay for them.
Welcome to the column where you provide the content. The Mocker took aim at the “brave battle” waged by academia and woke types – including Uju Anya, Sandy O’Sullivan and Senator Lidia Thorpe – against the “cruel coloniser” as personified by Queen Elizabeth II: “The Queen personified the traits of diligence, humility, and devotion to country. She saw her nation transformed into a haven for immigrants of all races and creeds seeking a better life. It is only right then that she be despised and vilified in death.” Dana was disgusted: