Kids add thrust to ‘catastrophe’

Illustration: Eric Lobbecke

“Eco-anxiety” has become the latest­ fashionable malaise. Apparently it is afflicting many children. That kids as young as four and five are anxious about the climate is not surprising — after all, they are fed a diet of doomsday scenarios by eco-alarmists. Having effect­ively been given permission to feel hyper-anxious about the coming Armageddon, many youngsters have wholeheartedly embraced the role of the stressed-out victim of humanity’s eco-crimes.

As usual, much of the media and popular culture have been at the forefront of cultivating this narrative about eco-anxious children. In a new HBO series, Euphoria, an over-the-top anxious teenager embraces what we might call the eco-doom excuse. She says there is little point in kicking her drug habit because “the world’s coming to an end and I haven’t even graduated­ high school yet”.

Another series, Big Little Lies, features a scene in which the daughter of one of the main characters has a panic attack in class after being relentlessly subjected to climate scare stories.

There is a wonderful moment in which the teacher asks the eight-year-olds: “How many gallons­ of water does it take to make a single pound of sausage?” As if participating in some kind of secular ritual, the chorus of children reply in unison: “A thousand!”

It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it has become a sign of virtue for both children and adults to make a display of the disturbing symptoms of eco-anxiety. Such symptoms show that we are aware and concerned. In turn, the idea that climate-change concern is causing mental suffering adds up to further proof of the damage caused by climate change. In recent­ months, there have been many reports about the mental-health consequences of climate change. For climate alarmists, the discovery of this alleged new malaise of eco-anxiety is a bonus.

Linking climate catastrophism to the deterioration in children’s mental health allows them to boost the eco-fear narrative. It is a good example of the concept of joined-up scaremongering.

Joined-up scaremongering usually involves taking a pre-existing­ danger and adding the idea that it poses a unique threat to children. Why? Because if you mention the word “child”, people will listen. You can raise the moral stakes by claiming a child is at risk. Something must be done.

For instance, campaigners against poverty know they are far more likely to gain sympathy for their cause if they draw attention to what is now called “child poverty­”. It is as if socio-economic injustices are not compelling enough on their own terms.

Or take campaigners on developing-world issues. They know that mentioning “child labour” or “child soldiers” is far more likely to resonate. Children, therefore, become­ a kind of moral resource that can be used to promote polic­ies and causes.

It is bad enough that society has become so devoted to scaring children about the survival of the planet. What is even more corrosive is the medicalisation of children’s concern, the transformation of it into a mental-health problem. The number of children supposedly suffering from a climate­-change-related mental-health problem is growing, we’re told.

Claims of an epidemic of eco-anxiety are typically vague. “No stats are available on the prevalence of eco-anxiety, but some experts­ have noted an increase in public anxiety around climate change,” writes one journalist.

One “expert”, Susan Clayton, co-author of a report titled Mental Health and Our Changing Clim­ate­: Impacts, Implications, and Guidance, speculates: “We can say that a significant propor­tion of people are experiencing stress and worry about the potential impacts of climate change, and that the level of worry is almost certainly increasing.’’

What is really increasing is the determination by experts and activis­ts to construct this new mental disease of eco-anxiety.

Indeed, eco-anxiety sounds suspiciously like any other form of anxiety. According to one description: “Symptoms of eco-anxiety include anxiety, depressed mood, insomnia, and feelings of loss, fear and helplessness. Symptoms in children may also include separation anxiety and somatisation — signs suggestive of physical illness but without a physical explan­a­tion. For example, stomach aches, headaches and extreme fatigue.”

Given that most of these symptoms are already associated with a variety of other mental-health conditions, it seems likely that normal anxiety is being rebranded as a psycho-eco-illness with the simple addition of the prefix “eco”.

Commentators acknowledge that eco-anxiety is more of a metaphor than a scientifically informed diagnosis. They usually say that it isn’t yet “an official diagnosis” and then imply that it’s only a matter of time before it will be included in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

As one observer says: ­“Although not yet listed in the mental-health manual … a number of professional organisations such as the UK Council for Psych­o­therapy, the American Psychological Association and the Well­come Trust have written about it.”

Apparently, it is not enough to scare children about their future and then medicalise their fears — scaremongers are now targeting parents, too. “Rising numbers of children are being treated for eco-anxiety, experts have said, as they warn parents against terrifying their youngsters with talk of clim­ate catastrophe,” London’s Daily Telegraph newspaper reported.

Yet the project of terrifying children about the climate is activel­y promoted at all levels of society. Pinning the blame on parent­s is a little dishonest.

This goes far beyond parents. We live in a world in which scaring children has become a form of “raising awareness” about the allege­d impending extinction of humanity. We live in a world in which environmental catastrophists use children to educate their supposedly irresponsible elders.

We live in a world in which it is apparently OK for climate activists to hide behind a 16-year-old girl and to use her youthful and innocent image to foist political views on the public.

Worst of all, we live in a world in which the language of mental illness is being used to ramp up the politics of fear. And we wonder why children feel scared.

Frank Furedi’s How Fear Works: the Culture of Fear in the 21st Century is published by Bloomsbury Press.