Cost-of-living woes pose a political catch-22
The Albanese government is caught between not making a bad situation worse and being seen to be doing something as Australians struggle to make ends meet.
The Albanese government is caught between not making a bad situation worse and being seen to be doing something as Australians struggle to make ends meet.
Having governed for 12 long years, once Labor offered a viable alternative, voters gave them a chance. It really is that simple.
Peter Dutton needs the NSW Liberal Party machine to remain functional to give himself a shot at government federally.
It’s easy to understand why it suits the Americans to offload some of the security responsibility for containing China. But is that in our interests too?
I’m growing increasingly concerned that the divisive debate means the referendum may fail. At the heart of such concern is the pursuit of constitutional rather than simple legislative reform.
The economy is set to dominate the political agenda through 2024, which could be an election year. The voice and climate might become afterthoughts for voters.
Both sides rely on virtue-signalling and class warfare rather than doing the heavy lifting of much-needed economic reform.
Tensions are running high between Anthony Albanese and Jim Chalmers at the moment. Each feels that the other is putting self-interest ahead of the national interest.
They knew exactly what they were doing: win the election via Graham Richardson’s ‘whatever it takes’ before switching gears.
If Dutton’s candidate loses, the knives will be out for him but if Labor loses, it will set a tone ahead of the budget which might change the political narrative.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/peter-van-onselen/page/9