Imperial ambition: history puts Putin in his place
Insightful analysis of the Ukraine war casts beyond what’s driving Vladimir Putin to a new more cooperative Russia, the role imagined for it by Mikhail Gorbachev almost 40 years ago.
Insightful analysis of the Ukraine war casts beyond what’s driving Vladimir Putin to a new more cooperative Russia, the role imagined for it by Mikhail Gorbachev almost 40 years ago.
Now, more than ever, is the time to read what Daniel Ellsberg knew and how he thought about decision-making under uncertainty in a world of nuclear arsenals.
While opponents like Paul Keating snipe at our strategic policies — and our new lethal weapons — they consistently spare scrutiny of China, despite its likeness to Nazi Germany in several ways.
Three new books suggest Vladimir Putin has made a complete hash of the Russian imperial project and triggered all the things he thought he could sweep away. Read and learn.
While the PM talks of dialogue, there is a real and present danger that Beijing will keep pushing to overturn the existing order.
Kim Jong-un and his sister Kim Yo-jong are a ruthless double act that has for years played both Seoul and Washington for fools.
Beijing’s systematic anti-transparency and Xi’s embrace of Putin have done nothing to dampen Daniel Andrews’ enthusiasm for amity with Beijing.
The lesson to learn from the Iraq war is not that the US is a rogue power in decline, but that effective, democratic grand strategy demands very high levels of thinking.
Let’s indulge our sharp-tongued former PM for a moment and imagine he is seeing something that almost everyone else is missing.
It’s not enough to win the war, the West also has to offer Russia the hope of a better future.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/paul-monk/page/5