Threat of a big stick just might get the job done
The preferred outcome will be for the big companies to see the new provision as a threat and mend their anti-competitive ways well before any court action is needed.
The preferred outcome will be for the big companies to see the new provision as a threat and mend their anti-competitive ways well before any court action is needed.
The external costs imposed on rural and regional communities are overwhelmingly ignored when making the case for the expansion of renewable energy.
There is much overseas data to establish accurate costings around nuclear power plants, including from successful builds in South Korea and the UAE.
High density, continuous and centralised power beats low density, intermittent and decentralised power every time. In other words, nuclear beats renewables.
Compared to the budgets of Queensland and Victoria, NSW is the ice-cream between two tasteless wafers. If that sounds like faint praise, it’s meant to.
Most countries that have signed the Paris Climate Agreement have not legislated their targets, including the biggest emitters.
The Miles government has clearly demonstrated that spending other people’s money is their DNA: profligacy is in vogue, prudent budgeting is so yesterday.
Simply setting a target for the number of homes to be built over a certain period doesn’t constitute a policy – it’s more akin to arm-waving.
We’re told South Australia was powered entirely by renewables for seven hours on one particular day. What about the other 17 hours?
The assumptions and organised bias in the CSIRO’s cost of generating electricity report render it absolutely useless – and the task should never have been left to scientists.
Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/judith-sloan/page/7