NewsBite

Advertisement

Melbourne’s Steven May handed three-match ban for clash with Blue: Tribunal hearing as it happened

Key posts

Pinned post from

Tribunal rules May ‘ran through Evans’ and hands down three-match ban

By Hannah Kennelly

Melbourne defender Steven May will miss the next three matches for a controversial collision with Carlton’s Francis Evans, after failing to beat a rough conduct charge at the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night.

May faced the tribunal for a high-speed, front-on collision with Evans last week– which left the Blues player concussed, and with a bloodied nose and missing tooth.

Steven May collects Francis Evans.

Steven May collects Francis Evans.

AFL match review officer Michael Christian assessed the incident as careless conduct, with severe impact and high contact and the AFL sought a three-match suspension penalty.

May pleaded not guilty to the charges and agreed to provide evidence during the tribunal hearing, maintaining he thought he would get to the ball before Evans.

May’s representative Adrian Anderson reviewed the footage and asked May why he had an expression of disbelief after the collision.

“Just can’t believe I didn’t take possession,” May said. “I thought I did everything right, so I’m just a bit shocked.”

Melbourne compared the incident to Fremantle captain Alex Pearce – who successfully challenged a three-game suspension earlier this year and was cleared of rough conduct. The Dockers skipper clashed in a marking contest with Port Adelaide’s Darcy Byrne-Jones, who was left concussed.

Loading

Pearce’s case differed from May’s in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact.

The tribunal also discussed the case involving North Melbourne’s Jackson Archer in March. The tribunal ruled the North Melbourne defender “slowed too little and too late” and the rough conduct charge was sustained. However, May’s advocate Adrian Anderson argues this case was different and May expected to get to the ball first.

AFL barrister Andrew Woods acknowledged that these circumstances were “not easy things for a player to assess”, and conceded that the collision between May and Evans was not a bump.

However, Woods maintained May could have taken reasonable action to avoid the clash. He argued May should have changed his momentum and trajectory to avoid the collision with Evans and noted a reasonable player would understand a ball can bounce unpredictably.

“Mr May’s conduct was a breach of a duty of care that he owed Evans,” Woods said.

Melbourne’s defence countered and said they fundamentally disagreed with the AFL’s position that Evans was going to get to the ball first.

Steven May will miss the next three games.

Steven May will miss the next three games. Credit: AFL Photos

Anderson said May did not have enough time to change his momentum and argued his attempts to win the ball were “entirely realistic”. He also noted May was contesting the ball, did not move off line and showed attempts to slow down, even though it was too late.

The tribunal deliberated for over 90 minutes and ultimately handed down a three-game suspension – a demonstration of the league’s crackdown on concerning head knocks.

The tribunal concluded May could and should have realised that Evans would have reached the ball first.

“He [May] ran through Evans at high speed,” tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said.

“We found that May engaged in rough conduct that was unreasonable in the circumstances,” he continued

May will miss the next three games, however the Demon suffered a concussion of his own during the Carlton match, when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he was set to miss Sunday’s match against St Kilda regardless.

Latest posts

That’s a wrap

By Hannah Kennelly

Thanks for joining us tonight for our (very long) coverage of the AFL Tribunal.

See you next time!

Swan gets five match ban for slur

By Greg Dundas

While the tribunal was deliberating about the May case, the AFL announced in a statement that Sydney Swans player Riak Andrew would serve a five-match suspension for making a homophobic slur against a North Melbourne opponent in a VFL match at the weekend.

Andrew was found guilty of conduct unbecoming after a Kangaroos player reported him to the umpires at the end of the first quarter, which prompted an investigation by the AFL integrity unit.

“In the course of the investigation, Andrew made full admissions and was remorseful and apologetic,” the AFL said.

Andrew’s ban applies to both the AFL and VFL, and also requires him to undertake “pride in sport” education.

“It is important that we continue to make clear that homophobia or homophobic language has no place in our game at any level or in the wider community for that matter,” AFL general counsel Stephen Meade said.

“It is disappointing to be dealing with another incident and while we will always examine the individual circumstances, the clear message is that this language is not acceptable in any workplace and that includes on the field of play.”

Tribunal rules May ‘ran through Evans’ and hands down three-match ban

By Hannah Kennelly

Melbourne defender Steven May will miss the next three matches for a controversial collision with Carlton’s Francis Evans, after failing to beat a rough conduct charge at the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night.

May faced the tribunal for a high-speed, front-on collision with Evans last week– which left the Blues player concussed, and with a bloodied nose and missing tooth.

Steven May collects Francis Evans.

Steven May collects Francis Evans.

AFL match review officer Michael Christian assessed the incident as careless conduct, with severe impact and high contact and the AFL sought a three-match suspension penalty.

May pleaded not guilty to the charges and agreed to provide evidence during the tribunal hearing, maintaining he thought he would get to the ball before Evans.

May’s representative Adrian Anderson reviewed the footage and asked May why he had an expression of disbelief after the collision.

“Just can’t believe I didn’t take possession,” May said. “I thought I did everything right, so I’m just a bit shocked.”

Melbourne compared the incident to Fremantle captain Alex Pearce – who successfully challenged a three-game suspension earlier this year and was cleared of rough conduct. The Dockers skipper clashed in a marking contest with Port Adelaide’s Darcy Byrne-Jones, who was left concussed.

Loading

Pearce’s case differed from May’s in that it was an aerial collision in a marking contest, but there were similarities in how Pearce arrived second to the ball and took his eyes off it at the last second to brace for contact.

The tribunal also discussed the case involving North Melbourne’s Jackson Archer in March. The tribunal ruled the North Melbourne defender “slowed too little and too late” and the rough conduct charge was sustained. However, May’s advocate Adrian Anderson argues this case was different and May expected to get to the ball first.

AFL barrister Andrew Woods acknowledged that these circumstances were “not easy things for a player to assess”, and conceded that the collision between May and Evans was not a bump.

However, Woods maintained May could have taken reasonable action to avoid the clash. He argued May should have changed his momentum and trajectory to avoid the collision with Evans and noted a reasonable player would understand a ball can bounce unpredictably.

“Mr May’s conduct was a breach of a duty of care that he owed Evans,” Woods said.

Melbourne’s defence countered and said they fundamentally disagreed with the AFL’s position that Evans was going to get to the ball first.

Steven May will miss the next three games.

Steven May will miss the next three games. Credit: AFL Photos

Anderson said May did not have enough time to change his momentum and argued his attempts to win the ball were “entirely realistic”. He also noted May was contesting the ball, did not move off line and showed attempts to slow down, even though it was too late.

The tribunal deliberated for over 90 minutes and ultimately handed down a three-game suspension – a demonstration of the league’s crackdown on concerning head knocks.

The tribunal concluded May could and should have realised that Evans would have reached the ball first.

“He [May] ran through Evans at high speed,” tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said.

“We found that May engaged in rough conduct that was unreasonable in the circumstances,” he continued

May will miss the next three games, however the Demon suffered a concussion of his own during the Carlton match, when Tom De Koning accidentally kneed him in the head during a last-quarter marking contest, so he was set to miss Sunday’s match against St Kilda regardless.

Advertisement

May cops three-match suspension

By Hannah Kennelly

After over 90 minutes of deliberations, the tribunal has finally come to a decision.

May is given a three-match suspension.

The tribunal is still deliberating (sorry)

By Hannah Kennelly

The clock is about to hit 90 minutes and we are still here.

No result yet.

Don’t worry, we are still here

By Hannah Kennelly

The tribunal has been deliberating for over an hour now. Stay with us!

Advertisement

No result yet

By Hannah Kennelly

Sorry folks, we don’t have any action for you… yet

The tribunal is still deliberating.

Deliberations continue

By Hannah Kennelly

Thanks for staying with us folks. The tribunal is still deliberating

Tribunal begins deliberations

By Hannah Kennelly

After nearly 90 minutes of evidence, the tribunal has retired to start deliberations.

Stay tuned folks.

Advertisement

Can Greg Swann put tribunal hearing length on the agenda next?

By Peter Ryan

Let’s cross to our sports reporter Peter Ryan who also has the joy of watching tonight’s tribunal.

His thoughts are below:

Can Greg Swann put tribunal-hearing length on the agenda next to game length?

May’s counsel Adrian Anderson has made a long and, some would argue (me), with respect, long-winded defence of May’s action.

It is difficult to judge which way the panel will fall, but Anderson’s final assessment comparing May’s act to Fremantle defender Alex Pearce’s collision with Port Adelaide’s Darcy Byrne-Jones line by line is his best argument.

The two are somewhat comparable, so the Demons’ defender is in with a fighter’s chance.

Most Viewed in Sport

Loading

Original URL: https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/steven-may-afl-tribunal-live-suspension-decision-to-be-handed-down-for-bump-on-francis-evans-20250723-p5mh51.html