Danila Dilba launches legal action against Woolworths Group, Director of Liquor licensing for approving Darwin Dan Murphy’s

AN INDIGENOUS health service has launched legal action against the NT Director of Liquor Licensing for approving the Darwin Dan Murphy’s store without ‘proper consideration’ of the potential impacts on the community

• ‘We’re here to listen’: Dan Murphy’s review chair assures Darwin community of open process
• Dan Murphy’s liquor licence transfer application approved for Darwin

AN INDIGENOUS health service has launched legal action against the NT Director of Liquor Licensing for approving the Darwin Dan Murphy’s store without “proper consideration” of the potential impacts on the community.

Danila Dilba health service has launched legal action in the Darwin Supreme Court against both the Director and Woolworths Group, which owns Dan Murphy’s, asking for the liquor licence approval to be cancelled.

Olga Havnen is the chief executive of the Danila Dilba Health Service

Danila Dilba chief executive Olga Havnen said the decision to approve the liquor licence failed to properly weigh up the risks and benefits of the new store.

“There’s no harm caused to the community by taking the time to properly consider the public interest and community impact of the proposal, but there is a lot of potential harm in a rushed process that neglects the public health impact,” she said.

“Our region is making progress with addressing alcohol-related harm, resulting in lower rates of assault, road accidents and emergency department presentations.

“The rushed decision to approve a Dan Murphy’s megastore is likely to unwind much of the good work we have achieved in reducing the harm caused by alcohol.”

Maurice Blackburn special counsel Jacinta Lewin, who is taking on the case as a part of its Social Justice Practice, said they will argue the decision to grant the licence to Dan Murphy’s is “infected with legal error.”

“We are asking the court to consider whether there was a failure to consider key evidence including community views, if parts of the decision were illogical or irrational, and whether it was even open to the Liquor Licensing Director to make the decision at the relevant time,” she said.

HOT NEW DEAL: Read everything for 28 days for just $1

“We are asking the Court to quash the decision on these grounds, and ensure that a decision that impacts the community is lawfully made.”

Follow @MsSarahMatthews