Shane McAdam’s suspension upheld after Adelaide Crows’ appeal fails
Shane McAdam will have to serve a lengthy ban after the Adelaide Crows' attempt to appeal the suspension failed.
Shane McAdam’s three-match suspension for rough conduct has been upheld after the Adelaide Crows lost their appeal.
McAdam was sent straight to the AFL Tribunal for his heavy late bump on GWS youngster Jacob Wehr in Adelaide’s Round 1 loss to the Giants.
McAdam ran through Wehr, sending his head snapping back in a hit that could be heard around the stadium.
Watch every match of every round of the 2023 Toyota AFL Premiership Season LIVE on Kayo Sports. New to Kayo? Start your free trial now >
The Crows player was handed a three-game ban as the AFL pushed for a lengthy suspension on the basis of the potential bump to cause injury to the Giants player.
Adelaide challenged the Tribunal’s decision on Thursday night at the AFL Appeals Board, but the suspension was upheld after a 75-minute hearing and a marathon 85-minute deliberation.
The Tribunal graded McAdam’s bump as careless conduct with severe impact and high contact, but the Crows argued an error of law had been made by the Tribunal in giving too much consideration to the potential to cause injury.
“There was no raised elbow. It was a bump primarily to the body. There was not significant head force. Jacob Wehr was in possession of the ball and continued to play out the game,” Tom Duggan said on behalf of the Crows.
“The classification of ‘severe’ (impact) was manifestly excessive.”
The suspension came after Melbourne's Kysaiah Pickett received a two-match ban for his hit on Bailey Smith, and Buddy Franklin was given a one-game ban for his hit on Gold Coast’s Sam Collins.
The Crows were said to be furious with the suspension.
On Wednesday, former Crows captain Mark Bickley torched the process that included such an “abnormality” in the grading system.
He said it is a “glaring hole” that there was such inconsistency between Pickett’s case and McAdam’s case.
“The way it’s presented at the tribunal, it’s like a court hearing,” Bickley said on SEN South Australia.
“I think sometimes we are in danger of disappearing up our own backsides, some of the rubbish that gets spoken about at the tribunal.”
McAdams’ representation responded to the AFL’s submissions by saying the bump is still a legal motion within the laws of the game and that he had not made contact with the head of his opponent.
More Coverage
“You can talk about the fact he could’ve tackled him and welcomed him with open arms, but that’s not a decision that has to be made, it’s perfectly fine to bump in the AFL,” McAdam’s lawyer said.
“If McAdam’s shoulder made contact with the head of Wehr, the head would’ve gone backwards. That’s not what happens, it simply rests forward.
“This is clearly not a high bump because it doesn’t in any way involve the head.”