South Africa reject Steve Smith’s ‘one-off’ tampering claim; reveal how they caught Cam Bancroft

STEVE Smith’s claim that the ball tampering scandal was a one-off mistake has been challenged by South Africa, with the hosts revealing how they hatched a plan earlier in the series to catch Australia in the act.

Steve Smith says the incident in Cape Town was a one-off.

STEVE Smith’s claim that the ball tampering scandal was a one-off mistake has been challenged by South African suspicions it happened earlier in the series.

South African broadcasters were tipped off that Australia were tampering with the ball in the first two Tests.

A spotfire burnt briefly in the second Test when South African batsmen complained to umpires that David Warner was using tape on his hand to rough up the ball.

Steve Smith says the incident in Cape Town was a one-off.

From that point South Africa’s SuperSport network made it a mission to track the ball during its path from keeper Tim Paine to the bowler which enabled them to capture Cameron Bancroft’s disgraceful act in Cape Town.

Commentator and former South African Test fast bowler Fanie de Villiers told RSN radio he sensed before the scandal erupted Australia may have been doing something untoward with the ball.

LISTEN! A special ball tampering crisis Cricket Unfiltered episode is out with News Corp’s Russell Gould and Andrew Menczel dissecting the fallout of the Australian cheating scandal.

You can download Cricket Unfiltered from the iTunes store

“I said earlier on, that if they could get reverse swing in the 26th, 27th, 28th over then they’re doing something different from what everyone else does,’’ de Villiers said.

“We actually said to our cameramen … go out have a look boys. They’re using something. They searched for an hour and a half until they saw something and then they started following Bancroft and they actually caught him out at the end.

CRUSHED: Aussie thrashed in third Test

GILLESPIE: Smith and Warner reign is over

OPINION: Where were the adults in the dressing room?

CRYSTAL BALL: Stand-in Paine leads race to replace Smith

ICC ACTS: Steve Smith suspended for role in cheating scandal

“It’s impossible for the ball to get altered like that on cricket wickets where we knew there was grass on, not a Pakistani wicket where there’s cracks every centimetre.

“We’re talking about grass covered wicket where you have to do something else to alter the shape, the roughness of the ball on the one side. You have to get the one side wetter, heavier than the other side.’’

“Australian teams getting reverse swing before the 30th over, they had to do something. If you use cricket ball and scratch it against a normal iron or steel gate or anything, anything steel on it, it reverse swings immediately. That’s the kind of extra alteration you need to do.’’

Cameras were told to track the cherry. Cameron Bancroft with the piece of tape. Picture: Fox Sports

Australia had their own suspicions about South Africa’s tactics.

One Australian player who walked out to the wicket before day two of the first Test at Durban told a commentator “how the **** could they get the ball to reverse swing after 18 overs yesterday?’’

That heightened Australia’s desperation to stay on pace in the race for reverse swing.

England allrounder Stuart Broad also had doubts about Smith’s statement.

“I saw Steve Smith say it was the first time they have tried it (using impregnated tape to tamper with the ball),’’ Broad said.

Bancroft scuffing the ball. Picture: Fox Sports

“To me, it’s surprising — why they would change a method that’s been working?

“If you look at the Ashes series we’ve just played, they reverse swung the ball in nearly all of those Test matches sometimes in conditions where you wouldn’t expect the ball to reverse.

“I don’t understand why they have changed their method for this one game.”

Originally published as South Africa reject Steve Smith’s ‘one-off’ tampering claim; reveal how they caught Cam Bancroft