Why companies shouldn’t be spooked by online bullies
TWITTER is a boon for activists where they can create multiple accounts and amplify their protest. In a six week period just 10 accounts sent 4,500 tweets to Sky News’ advertisers, writes Rita Panahi.
Rita Panahi
Don't miss out on the headlines from Rita Panahi. Followed categories will be added to My News.
THE Mark Knight furore gave the masses, who largely ignore the culture wars, a glimpse into the world of the perpetually aggrieved. Sadly, many in the media and political class pander to these intellectually infirm fringe-dwellers whose views are also prevalent in the more useless branches of academia.
These people do not feel whole unless they are outraged about something, anything, even if it means being outraged on behalf of others. Trivial and imagined offences are given the same weight as real racism and sexism and the offenders are treated accordingly.
After numerous death threats Knight chose to close his Twitter account to deprive the baying mob of one less avenue of abuse. But by the middle of last week is wasn’t just Knight who was maligned as a hopeless racist, misogynist body-shamer but the entire country was being smeared in certain US publications.
VICTORIAN TRANSPORT MINISTER TURNS CHIEF CENSOR
HERALD SUN BACKS MARK KNIGHT’S SERENA WILLIAMS CARTOON
ANDREW BOLT: LEFT’S GROWING VIOLENCE WILL NOT END WELL
Nowadays, what tends to follow an outrage orgy is the ongoing online bullying of individuals, companies and their advertisers and affiliates. We’ve seen it in the US and UK and now the same strategy is being employed in Australia to intimidate and silence voices that deviate from far-Left dogma. These campaigns have succeeded in startling some companies which are suddenly inundated by hundreds, sometimes thousands, of irate complaints from aggrieved individuals.
But look a little deeper and you see that the sheer volume of numbers isn’t really what it seems. In some instances there are a few dozen individual activists behind thousands of complaints. Twitter is a boon for activists where they can create multiple accounts and amplify their protest by sending an avalanche of tweets to companies.
One would hope companies that can afford to advertise on television would know better than to be spooked by a few online trolls but that is not always the case. In the past we’ve seen companies from small retailers like Peter Alexander to giants like Target pull products off their shelves after an online campaign by a tiny but loud minority of moaners. It seems a few anonymous activists pumping out thousands of tweets in a short space of time can alarm a company sufficiently to change its marketing campaign. Senior management at most medium to large businesses is reliant on advice from their marketing teams including “social media experts”. That’s where the system can break down.
If you’ve ever dealt with a “social media expert” you’d know their advice may be lacking in judgement, rationality or anything approaching evidence based analysis.
In recent weeks a number of Australian companies including Qantas have been bombarded by thousands of complaints imploring them to pull their advertising or affiliation with Sky News Australia, owned by the Herald Sun’s publisher and home to the champagne television that is The Friday Show between 4 and 6 pm.
Slowly but surely Australian companies are becoming wise to the tactics of totalitarian mobs like “Sleeping Giants,” a collection of likeminded far Left malcontents with considerable time on their hands who launch coordinated attacks against individuals or companies they don’t like.
Sleeping Giants has been supported by Leftwing activist group GetUp and the usual gaggle of far Left media activists including a Fairfax feminist blogger. The group, which has also targeted 2GB and Channel Seven, is responsible for the orchestrated Twitter campaign to intimidate Sky News sponsors including Citi and IGA.
In a six week period just 10 accounts sent 4,500 tweets to Sky News’ advertisers, according to analysis carried out by social media monitoring firm Brandwatch. Indeed the majority of all the tweets sent to Sky News’ advertisers came from fewer than 200 Twitter accounts, more than 70 per cent of which were anonymous. It is impossible to determine how many individuals operate these 200 accounts but you can be certain that most if not all of these online activists have multiple accounts purely for the purposes of their activism.
What we do know is that Qantas was bombarded by more than 7,000 tweets. Sky News boss and Australian News Channel CEO Angelos Frangopoulos is fighting back against the fear campaign and misinformation.
“It’s time to call this out for what it is: a political activist group,” he said. “Hiding behind ‘social value’, they carry out a commercial terrorist campaign by confecting consumer outrage…Some ‘advertisers’ who have banned us have never even advertised with us. Others who they claim have banned us are still advertising.””
In the UK a group calling itself “Stop Funding Hate” has also had success in intimidating companies into making stupid decisions. Late last year, Virgin Trains, showing a corporate backbone with the consistency of warmed butter, gave into the bullying and stopped selling the Daily Mail because of its coverage of immigration and LGBT issues.
The decision had to be reversed within weeks after an outcry from real consumers, not the imaginary ones with multiple Twitter accounts. Richard Branson stepped in to reassurel Britons that Virgin would not “censor what our customers read” nor “moralise on behalf of others.”
As far as I’m concerned any company that gives in to the feral mob is not worthy of my patronage.
‘KNIGHT IS ABOUT AS RACIST AS I’M CHINESE’
Human cost of pandemic goes much further than virus
Whether you are pro or anti-lockdown the grim, unintended consequences of the fixation on coronavirus are undeniable, as other diseases — including cancer and heart disease — go unchecked, and despair from joblessness, poverty and financial stress rises, writes Rita Panahi.
Will buck really stop with Dan after disastrous decisions?
While Daniel Andrews repeats the “we’re all in this together” mantra, the reality is only the private sector is making huge financial sacrifices as he refuses to face up to scrutiny over the hotel quarantine fiasco and contact tracing chaos, writes Rita Panahi.