Chinmay Naik accuses Monash University of discrimination over fail grade
A journalism student who took his fight over a failed uni assignment to the state’s highest court — and lost — has now tried to claim Monash University discriminated against him when it handed out the dud mark.
Inner South
Don't miss out on the headlines from Inner South . Followed categories will be added to My News.
A journalism student who took his fight against a failed assignment to the state’s highest court — and lost — has now tried to claim Monash University staff discriminated against him by issuing the dismal mark.
Chinmay Naik received just 12 marks out of 100 for a Masters of Journalism video assignment about negative stereotypes surrounding different dog breeds, causing him to fail the entire subject.
Mr Naik, 23, had already been granted a 19-day extension to submit the assignment, which included “a video of three vox pops … asking very general and unconnected questions surrounding dogs”.
The Court of Appeal last year ruled Mr Naik has “no arguable case” against Monash University and upheld the Supreme Court’s decision to throw the matter out.
But the international student has now claimed he was “victimised” by the academic board after they refused to let him submit a fresh assignment.
In a VCAT hearing, Mr Naik said he had been “clearly subjected” to a detriment under the Equal Opportunity Act “of being forever denied of completing his task”, after the board changed its policy so that students could not submit further deferred exams or assessment tasks more than 12 months after the end of the examination period for the unit the student was enrolled in.
Mr Naik called for an “unconditional apology for such predatory and victimising behaviour from the top-level management of Monash University”, as well $100,000 in damages suffered as a result of the alleged victimisation and a written assurance that “such an abuse of power” would not happen again.
But tribunal member Barry Josephs dismissed Mr Naik’s claim, labelling it “manifestly hopeless, undoubtedly untenable … and bound to fail”.
MORE:
TEACHER SACKED OVER CHILD SAFETY FIGHTS FOR HIS JOB BACK