NewsBite

Lisa Wilkinson, Ch10 win defamation case after Bruce Lehrmann found to have raped Brittany Higgins

Channel 10 and Lisa Wilkinson have won the defamation case brought against them by Bruce Lehrmann after Justice Michael Lee found Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins inside Parliament House. Read how the judgment unfolded.

Justice Michael Lee finds Bruce Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins

Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson have won the multimillion-dollar defamation case brought against them by Bruce Lehrmann after Justice Michael Lee found Lehrmann raped Brittany Higgins inside Parliament House.

In a landmark decision in the Federal Court on Monday, Justice Michael Lee found in favour of the network and Wilkinson after they were sued by Mr Lehrmann over The Project interview with Ms Higgins in February 2021.

Justice Lee read out a two-and-a-half hour summary of his decision, with tens of thousands of people watching live on the court's YouTube channel.

Read how the judgment unfolded below.

Updates

Homeless, jobless and broke: Lehrmann’s new future

The judge said it best: Having escaped the lion’s den, Bruce Lehrmann made the mistake of coming back for his hat.

In court today, his reputation was mauled.

The loss in the civil defamation case he initiated, and which put him into the dock, after a criminal trial for rape had been aborted, leaves him broke, unemployed, seemingly homeless, rumoured to be deeply in debt, his reputation shredded.

Perhaps one of the few sure things ahead for Lehrmann is another court date.

Read the full story here.

Wilkinson speaks after defamation case win

Lisa Wilkinson has spoken outside court thanking her family and legal team for their support after a judge ruled in her favour.

"I was so grateful to have had the benefit of my independent legal team," Ms Wilkinson said.

Lisa Wilkinson outside court after winning her defamation case.
Lisa Wilkinson outside court after winning her defamation case.

"Their expertise and wise counsel have been a source of ongoing strength to me for the last 14 months. Throughout every step of this process, I have been surrounded by the love of my wonderful family, as well as incredibly supportive friends and colleagues.

"I can never thank them enough. I also want to say how grateful I am to all the generous members of the public who have approached me almost every single day to express often through tears, their unwavering support."

'Rapist' Bruce Lehrmann leaves court

Bruce Lehrmann has quickly left the Federal Court after being found by Justice Michael Lees to have raped Brittany Higgins inside Parliament House.

Lehrmann briskly walked out of court and down Phillip Street, surrounded by a mob of reporters and photographers asking for his response to being ruled a rapist, and for his response to his civil action against Network 10 dramatically failing.

Lehrmann refused to answer any questions, and walked alone – with no lawyers or supporters alongside him.

Bruce Lehrmann leaves the Federal Court after losing his defamation case against Lisa Wilkinson and Channel 10. Picture: Max Mason-Hubers
Bruce Lehrmann leaves the Federal Court after losing his defamation case against Lisa Wilkinson and Channel 10. Picture: Max Mason-Hubers

Bruce Lehrmann sensationally loses defamation case

Justice Lee has ruled in favour of Channel 10 and Lisa Wilkinson in one of the biggest defamation cases in our time.

He said Mr Lehrmann has not been convicted of any criminal offence, but has been found of grave wrongdoing in a civil court.

Going onto the issue of whether damages should be awarded, Justice Lee has said: “Having escaped the lion’s den, Mr Lehrmann made the mistake in coming back for his hat”.

Justice Lee said Mr Lehrmann is not entitled to the vindication of his reputation. "The respondents, however, are entitled to vindication by the entry of judgment on the statement of claim".

The judge said that in finding Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins, there are differences between this ruling in a civil court, and a ruling made in a criminal trial.

Justice Lee said his judgement of rape is on the "balance of probabilities" instead of the requirement of "beyond reasonable doubt" as needed in criminal court.

He said parties should submit their arguments for costs by April 24.

Lehrmann 'raped Ms Higgins': Justice Lee

Justice Lee has ruled Brittany Higgins did not consent to having sex with Bruce Lehrmann.

The judge found Ms Higgins was credible when she recounted coming to and becoming aware of Mr Lehrmann on top of her.

“I’ve reached a state of actual persuasion on the balance of probabilities that Ms Higgins was not fully aware of her surroundings when sexual intercourse commenced and did not consent to intercourse when she became aware Mr Lehrmann was on top of her,” Justice Lee said.

The judge said Mr Lehrmann was "indifferent" as to whether Ms Higgins was consenting.

He said he was satisfied it was more likely than not he was so intent on gratification that he was “hellbent on having sex” with her.

“I consider it more likely than not in those early hours, after a long night of conviviality and drinking and having successfully brought Ms Higgins back to a secluded place, Mr Lehrmann was hellbent on having sex with a woman he a) found sexually attractive, b) had been passionately kissing and touching, c) had encouraged to drink and d) knew had reduced inhibitions because she was very drunk," Justice Lee said.

“In his pursuit of gratification, he did not care one way or the other whether Ms Higgins understood or agreed to what was going on.

"Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins."

However, the judge stressed this was a civil court and not a criminal court, and therefore the requirements for him to reach that conclusion were different.

'Sexual intercourse did take place': Justice Lee

Federal Court Justice Michael Lee is now delivering his findings about what happened in the ministerial suite in the early hours of March 23, 2019.

“I am convinced … that sexual intercourse did take place," he said.

However, he did not find that Ms Higgins said “no on a loop”. He said it was “more likely than not” that she was passive.

Now the judge moves to the question of whether Ms Higgins was too drunk to consent.

This is crucial, given he has already found she consumed at least 11 drinks.

Five 'incontrovertible facts'

Justice Lee says there are five “incontrovertible facts”:

1. Bruce Lehrmann and Brittany Higgins were in the suite for 40 minutes together

2. During that time, Mr Lehrmann did not answer six calls from his girlfriend

3. Mr Lehrmann left the suite about 2.33am

4. Ms Higgins fell asleep after Mr Lehrmann's departure

5. Security officers performed a welfare check on Ms Higgins and found her in a state of undress

'Sufficient time' for sex in ministerial office, Judge says

Justice Lee said while the pair were inside the ministerial suite for 40 minutes, Mr Lehrmann ignored six phone calls from his girlfriend.

He said there was "sufficient time" for Mr Lehrmann and Ms Higgins to continue to drink and have "coitus".

He says Mr Lehrmann left around 2.33am and Ms Higgins was found sometime later either naked or semi-naked by a security officer.

Judge labels Lehrmann's suite story a 'transparent lie'

In speaking to what happened when the pair arrived at Parliament House, Justice Lee said Ms Higgins was a willing participant going into Senator Reynolds' office, and that Mr Lehrmann had "one thing" on his mind.

Ms Higgins captured on CCTV walking barefoot through Parliament House was an indication of her state of intoxication, the judge said. Justice Lee has said Ms Higgins' cognitive abilities would have been impacted due to the amount she had drunk on the night in question. He also has said Mr Lehrmann would have been aware of her altered state.

He said it was "elaborate fancy" that a man who had already "pashed" a woman would be going to the building to collect documents for something that wasn't required for a week-and-a-half.

Justice Lee agreed with Channel 10 that Bruce Lehrmann told a "transparent lie" about his actions while inside Parliament House on the night of the alleged rape.

He said "it's convenient Lehrmann maintains the only work he did was move and mark up paperwork, the only work he could have done without leaving any digital record."

Lehrmann wished to have sex with Higgins: Justice Lee

Justice Lee then examined the night at Parliament House.

He found Miss Higgins and Mr Lehrmann did share a "passionate" kiss at Canberra nightclub 88mph.

"One does not pash passively", the judge said.

But he said Mr Lehrmann's account that the pair shared an Uber together to Parliament House to collect a set of keys was "risible".

"Nothing good happens after 2am".

Justice Lee said "there was one dominant thing in the mind of Mr Lehrmann as they approached Parliament House and it had nothing to do with French submarine contracts."

Significantly, Justice Lee has said Mr Lehrmann did wish to have sex with Ms Higgins after earlier having an intimate moment with her on the night in question.

“He was a 23-year-old male cheating on his girlfriend, having just hooked up with a woman he found sexually attractive … human experience suggests what he wanted to happen is not exactly shrouded in mystery,” he said.

Briittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann entering Parliament House on night of her alleged rape.
Briittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann entering Parliament House on night of her alleged rape.

Original URL: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nsw/bruce-lehrmanns-defamation-case-judgment-announced-watch-live/live-coverage/38bb8288111e4939d091de0930f5089d