Jealousy drove OnlyFans model Matilda Marshall’s alleged DV offending
A court has heard the list of allegations against an Illawarra-based online influencer with the OnlyFans model accused of lashing out at her boyfriend over “girls on his phone”.
Illawarra Star
Don't miss out on the headlines from Illawarra Star. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Details have emerged of an Illawarra OnlyFans model’s alleged jealousy-fuelled assault of her partner.
Matilda Marshall failed in her bid for freedom in Wollongong Local Court on Monday, four days after she was denied bail in the same jurisdiction.
The 33-year-old pleaded not guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm, contravening an apprehended violence order, and breaching bail conditions.
The allegations come as proceedings continue about similar charges relating to the same on-again-off-again boyfriend, with the matter to be heard in Katoomba Local Court in March.
Documents tendered in court stated Marshall breached her bail and the AVO by turning up at the alleged victim’s Port Kembla address last Wednesday.
The pair engaged in a heated argument for several hours about girls, who the documents indicated he went to the gym with, on the man’s phone.
It’s alleged the argument turned physical with Marshall grabbing a drink bottle from the man before jumping on him and snatching his phone.
The court documents stated Marshall allegedly scratched the man on his neck and ribs, while also bruising the latter.
The couple began wrestling on the bed with the alleged victim trying to restrain Marshall while yelling “stop Matilda, stop”.
The man was eventually able to contact police who turned up at the address and arrested the accused before taking her to Lake Illawarra Command.
In court on Monday, Marshall, who has more than 7000 Instagram followers and nearly 14,000 likes on OnlyFans, said she had a full-time administration job, a beauty business start-up, and was a member of the Wollongong Chess Club.
Marshall also said she had borderline personality disorder before stating she had “deep shame and regret” about the allegations, adding she would “take this experience and learn from it”.
Magistrate Michael Stoddart intervened, suggesting those comments didn’t align with her not guilty plea with Marshall responding “I don’t want to be here anymore”.
“With respect, whose fault it is you're in there,” Mr Stoddart said.
“How hard is it to understand the basics of an AVO?”
“It may not be as serious as some matters that come before the court, but you were on bail at the time meaning you were obligated to abide by the conditions of your bail.”
A hearing date was listed for May 4, leading Marshall to tear up and plead “I want it dealt with today in that case, I don't want to be in here”.
Mr Stoddart said he could if she pleaded guilty, however, she maintained her not guilty plea with the matter adjourned for three months.