Calls to prune back ‘exorbitant’ tree protection rules set by Hobart City Council
Hobart City Council has agreed to rethink its tree-chopping rules following public outcry over a $60,000 quote to remove a single tree. LATEST >>
Tasmania
Don't miss out on the headlines from Tasmania. Followed categories will be added to My News.
Hobart City Council has agreed to rethink its tree-chopping rules following a public outcry over its “exorbitant” compensation fees.
It comes after The Mercury reported on the case of one developer who was told he’d have to pay $60,000 in order to receive council’s permission to remove a single tree.
Councillor Simon Behrakis said this was clearly excessive, and proof that the whole policy needed reviewing.
“It is clearly apparent that this does not align with community expectations and places an inordinate cost on those developing much-needed housing in our city,” Cr Behrakis said.
“The burden of this cost [is] falling on those who can least afford it in the form of higher housing and rental prices.”
However Lord Mayor Anna Reynolds said council’s own officers and industry experts agreed that the current policy was best practice.
Cr Reynolds said she saw little point in reviewing a policy that was already recognised around Australia as industry standard.
“I think this is a really good policy, it’s a fairly new policy, and I think it needs more time to be utilised and lessons learnt from it,” Cr Reynolds said.
“Just because we’ve had one particular case brought to us, why would we go to all the work to review a policy that … is currently best national practice.”
Deputy mayor Helen Burnett said, if anything, the tree compensation rules did not go far enough in protecting Hobart’s natural assets.
“I think this motion could actually strengthen the tree protection policy – that’s certainly what I’d like to see,” Cr Burnett said.
“It’s really important we retain some of the trees for climate change reasons, for habitat, and so I look forward to this being strengthened.”
Ald Marti Zucco said this was an experimental policy which, in his view, was already showing its failings.
“The officers originally, when we put this policy up, had some serious reservations that it hadn’t been tested,” Ald Zucco said.
“We’ve got this situation and it’s only appropriate we review it if we are going to have an airtight policy, and this one here isn’t.”
The motion was ultimately passed despite the opposition of Cr Reynolds, Cr Burnett, and Cr Mike Dutta.
More Coverage
Originally published as Calls to prune back ‘exorbitant’ tree protection rules set by Hobart City Council
Planning changes branded ’undemocratic’
The government’s plan to ban third-party appeals against development approvals are “some of the most anti-democratic laws the state has ever seen”, Planning Matters Alliance Tasmania says.
Seven people charged during Party in the Paddock festival
Police were out in force for the Party in the Paddock festival, putting in a finale effort through a road safety operation. The results.