NewsBite

Annika Smethurst: AFP prosecution and even jail are still a threat

The High Court’s unified position that police unlawfully entered my home brought some relief. To borrow a phrase from Scott Morrison the week the raid took place: It never troubles me that our laws are being upheld. But, sadly, my case is far from over, writes News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst.

High Court win welcomed, but Annika Smethurst still faces possibility of AFP investigation

On Wednesday I ­finally got my car serviced. I also found out that the High Court of Australia had quashed the warrant the police used to raid my apartment in June.

Having never been before any court, let alone the highest court in the land, I was unsure how I would hear the verdict.

News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst in Canberra after the High Court decision. Picture: Gary Ramage
News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst in Canberra after the High Court decision. Picture: Gary Ramage

MORE NEWS

‘I thought this is me done – I’m f**king dead’

Meghan risks looking like a Stephen King horror story

I also didn’t know what to do with myself as I waited to hear the result.

It had been five months since I sat before the seven judges at the High Court in Canberra where my legal team argued that the warrant the police used to enter my home was not up to scratch.

As it turns out, the High Court agreed.

When the news of my “win” filtered through to me, I was walking my dog.

This juxtaposition — of the enormity and the mundane — is something I have had to learn to live with.

It was 10 months ago that seven police officers arrived at my Canberra apartment to conduct a very public search prompted by an article I had written a year earlier since that day — June 4 — I have woken up every morning knowing there is a chance I could be arrested and even go to jail.

I still don’t know if this will happen as the threat is still there. Somehow the stress and uncertainty I have lived with for almost a year hasn’t stopped the world from turning.

AFP officers going through Annika Smethurst’s home in Canberra. Picture: Supplied
AFP officers going through Annika Smethurst’s home in Canberra. Picture: Supplied
Seven AFP officers raided Annika Smethurst’s Canberra unit. Picture: Supplied
Seven AFP officers raided Annika Smethurst’s Canberra unit. Picture: Supplied

While high profile advocates like Bono and Amal Clooney joined my cause, at home in Canberra, I went to work. The garden still needed to be watered and the dog still needed to be fed.

I have celebrated the weddings, birthdays and new ­babies of my friends but, for me, it’s as if my life has been on hold. I’m envious of everyone who forgets my fight because, for me, there hasn’t been a ­single day since June when I haven’t wondered how I would adapt to life in jail.

Would my family visit? How often?
The unified position of the High Court that the warrant the police used to enter my property was unlawful has brought some relief.

To borrow a phrase from Scott Morrison the week my house was raided: It never troubles me that our laws are being upheld.

As relieved as I am, sadly my case is far from over.

AFP officers leave Ms Smethurst’s home with documents after they raided her unit in Canberra.
AFP officers leave Ms Smethurst’s home with documents after they raided her unit in Canberra.

In quashing the warrant, the High Court found it failed to meet the most basic legal ­requirements, therefore the search was illegal.

The warrant not only lacked clarity, it misstated the offence being investigated and what kind of information was being sought. As it turns out, the police shouldn’t have stepped past the front door let alone conducted an invasive search of my phone, computer, mobile phone, drawers and books.
Yet for reasons I will never fully understand, the police have been allowed to hold on to material seized that day and may even use it as evidence in any potential prosecution of me or a whistleblower, even though it was obtained illegally.
It’s been two years since I wrote the story that triggered the raid. It revealed the government was considering allowing our own military spies to spy on Australians, not just foreigners as had always been the case.

The High Court of Australia in Canberra found the AFP warrant failed to meet the most basic legal ­requirements, therefore the search was illegal. Picture: AAP
The High Court of Australia in Canberra found the AFP warrant failed to meet the most basic legal ­requirements, therefore the search was illegal. Picture: AAP

Despite countless opportunities to do so, the AFP and the government have refused to rule out charging me.
This saga has taken an enormous toll on my life and those around me. As prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull would refer to parents, children or partners as conscripts, and that’s exactly what my family have become.

This saga has also rattled my unwavering determination to be a journalist. But, when I have toyed with the idea of stepping away from the only job I have known — and for the most part loved — my inner bolshie surfaces and I remind myself that stepping away would be admitting defeat.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/annika-smethurst-afp-prosecution-and-even-jail-are-still-a-threat-but-i-wont-let-them-beat-me/news-story/b53f29c3881e7fa31a8e61ec7b806b4c