Ex-MP Ian Macdonald got ‘nothing’ out of failing to put coal mining exploration licence to tender, lawyer says
The emotional wife of jailed former NSW politician Ian Macdonald gave media the finger on Tuesday outside the Court of Criminal Appeal where her husband appeared via video link to challenge his 10-year conviction for misconduct in public office over a coal exploration licence.
The emotional wife of jailed former NSW politician Ian Macdonald gave media the finger on Tuesday outside the Court of Criminal Appeal where her husband appeared via video link to challenge his 10-year conviction for misconduct in public office over a coal exploration licence.
The former Labor MP, who looked much thinner when he appeared via video link in his prison greens, smiled and waved to supporters in the public gallery including his wife, Anita Gylseth.
But the emotional toll on Ms Gylseth - who has always maintained that her husband is innocent - was evident when she walked outside on a break to find waiting media.
Macdonald, 69, is challenging his conviction and sentence after he was jailed in June 2017 for at least seven years on two counts of wilful misconduct in public office.
The charges related to his signing over a NSW Hunter Valley coal exploration licence in 2008 without a competitive tender to Doyles Creek Mining, chaired by former union boss John Maitland.
Macdonald’s barrister Phillip Boulten SC told the appeal a bright line was needed to distinguish “sloppy or negligent conduct” in public office and criminal conduct punishable by jail.
MORE NEWS
Alan Jones in hospital as latest 2GB ratings revealed
‘Wrong meds’ prompted threat to post nude videos
Sophie Monk goes public with new man
Mr Boulten said the prosecution in his client’s jury trial had needed to prove beyond reasonable doubt he had “the intention to decide the issue with an improper motive”.
But the trial judge didn’t direct the jury properly on intent, Mr Boulten told five judges in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal.
He said that when people held public office, there needed to be a bright line demarcating sloppy or negligent conduct on one hand and criminal conduct which could lead to prison time on the other.
“It needs to be clear to the jury that the impropriety needs to be so obvious and so determinative as to be a criminal offence,” Mr Boulten said.
He told the court there was no evidence to “sustain the existence of a motive”, although the prosecution suggested a motive of friendship.
There was no financial motive and Macdonald got ‘nothing” out of the exploration licence, the lawyer said.
He said Macdonald, as mining minister, made decisions in accordance with the Mining Act and he had a proper basis to directly allocate the licence.
He’s appealing his conviction and sentence while Maitland, who was jailed for at least four years for being an accessory to the misconduct, is just appealing his conviction.
Macdonald’s five grounds for appeal include that the trial judge misdirected the jury, that the jury’s verdicts were unreasonable and couldn’t be supported by the evidence and there was a miscarriage of justice because the prosecution had access to evidence compulsorily obtained at the Independent Commission Against Corruption.
The hearing continues.
Pro-Palestine speaker’s visa under review after ‘celebration’ remark
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke is reviewing the visa of a US guest speaker who told a pro-Palestine vigil in Western Sydney that October 7 was a cause for “celebration”.
‘So, so devastating’: Mainstay deli shuts after 70 years
The closure of an iconic southwest Sydney deli has prompted its legion of customers to express how the institution – treasured like the Opera House – meant more than prosciutto and panini.