We have to draw your attention away from budget estimates for a hot minute because the final report looking into the state's whistleblower laws has been published (as of 5.30pm which is totally fine, I'm not mad at all)
Laws protecting Queensland’s public service whistleblowers should be ripped up and redrawn in a bid to provide more protections a major review has concluded.
Retired Supreme Court judge Alan Wilson KC was tasked with reviewing the state’s Public Interest Disclosure laws in late 2022, with the state government releasing the comprehensive report late on Tuesday afternoon.
The 107 recommendations centre on a complete rewrite of the laws.
Changes include increasing the threshold for disclosure to “better situate whistleblowing in the broader integrity landscape and enable administrative resourcing to be directed where it will have the most value”
Mr Wilson noted the reforms would undoubtedly cost the government money but the additional funding needing to be directed to the Ombudsman, the CCC and other agencies would not be “excessive”.
The report also outlined how the changes to whistleblowing laws would advance a “clearer and more efficient method for managing” disclosures to promote “procedural fairness and administrative efficiencies”.
“It advocates for stronger and more proactive oversight by, in particular, the Ombudsman – whose greater involvement, the Review believes, offers an avenue for inspiring confidence in the new scheme and, in the longer run, ensuring the enduring success of the reformed legislation,” Mr Wilson noted.
Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath described the review as “game-changing” and said whistleblowers would be given more protections.
“Understandably, being so comprehensive and broad, and with more than 100 recommendations, the Government will consider all of the recommendations and reasonings,” she said.
Queensland Health’s submission to the Public Interest Disclosure review, signed off by Director-General Shaun Drummond, put the now-former executive in hot water.
The department had called for the government to consider penalties when “inappropriate” information is released in a submission to a review of Public Interest Disclosure laws.
The review did not recommend any new penalties, only for existing penalties—such as for breaching confidentiality—be brought in line with comparable consequences in other pieces of state legislation.