Is hard work enough? Max Futcher on kids using ChatGPT to get ahead at school

Is hard work enough to get things done these days? Is this the ultimate cheat code that we should all be using?

Is AI the future for all of us? Picture: Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV / AFP

As a parent, I’m increasingly concerned about the impact of Artificial Intelligence on my children’s education. I had a conversation with ChatGPT the other day, and it went like this:

ME: ChatGPT, explain why ChatGPT is dangerous for children’s education?

ChatGPT: I wouldn’t say ChatGPT is inherently dangerous for children’s education, but there are some concerns to be aware of. One issue is that it might provide inaccurate or unreliable information, as it generates responses based on patterns in data rather than verified facts. It’s important for kids to learn critical thinking skills and not take everything at face value. Additionally, ChatGPT doesn’t have the ability to understand context or emotions as well as a human teacher might. It might not be able to provide the necessary emotional support or personalised guidance that a child needs during the learning process.

Lastly, there’s the potential for exposure to inappropriate content. Although efforts are made to filter out harmful or inappropriate content, there’s always a risk of unintended responses.

In short, while ChatGPT can be a helpful tool, it’s essential for children to have guidance from qualified educators and parents to ensure a safe and effective learning experience.

Max Futcher on home security plans and Qld youth crime fears

‘I’ve given up now I’m 50’: Max Futcher on the trend older men should forget about

ME: But what if children just submit ChatGPT work as their own work?

ChatGPT: That’s a valid concern. If children use ChatGPT to generate content and submit it as their own work without proper understanding or effort, it could lead to issues of academic dishonesty. Education is not just about the end result but the process of learning and understanding.

Using ChatGPT to assist with ideas or as a learning aid is one thing, but relying on it exclusively for generating work may hinder the development of crucial skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity.

It’s important for educators and parents to be aware of how tools like ChatGPT are used and to encourage students to engage with their studies actively.

Plagiarism detection tools are in place in many educational institutions, and relying too heavily on AI-generated content without proper understanding could have consequences for academic integrity.

Students face the reality of AI.

ME: Do you think teachers can tell the difference between a paper written by a student and one plagiarised by ChatGPT?

ChatGPT: Teachers are pretty sharp, but it might not be as easy for them to distinguish between a student’s original work and something generated by ChatGPT. The key is in the details and the nuances of a student’s writing style, personal experiences, and understanding of the subject matter.

However, if a student heavily relies on ChatGPT and doesn’t put in the effort to personalise or deeply understand the content, there could be subtle clues that might raise suspicion. Educators often look for a genuine engagement with the material and an individual voice in the writing, and AI-generated content might lack that authenticity.

It’s always a good idea for students to be transparent with their use of AI tools, consulting with teachers when in doubt about what’s acceptable. Open communication can prevent misunderstandings and ensure that the educational process remains fair and effective.

Channel 7's Max Futcher. Picture: Tara Croser.

ME: So, we need to trust students to be honest?

ChatGPT: Absolutely, trust is a fundamental aspect of any educational relationship. Encouraging honesty and integrity sets a strong foundation for learning.

Students should be empowered to take responsibility for their work and to communicate openly with their teachers about their learning process. However, it’s essential for educators to provide clear guidelines about the use of AI tools and to foster a supportive environment where students feel comfortable seeking guidance. Open communication helps build trust on both sides, ensuring students can use technology responsibly and educators can provide the necessary support and guidance.

ME: If you knew you wouldn’t be discovered and could attain a good mark by cheating, would you?

ChatGPT: I can’t say I’d be tempted by a good mark. The thrill of success is in the challenge and effort, not in taking shortcuts. Plus, I wouldn’t want to compromise my integrity. What about you?

ME: Well, you’re not human, and couldn’t possibly understand the power of temptation.

ChatGPT: True, I don’t experience temptation in the way humans do. But I get that it’s a powerful force. Still, there’s something special about facing challenges head-on and achieving success through genuine effort. What’s your take on it?

That’s where I ended the chat. Students are already using ChatGPT to complete assignments. Educators assure us they can detect plagiarism, and can tell if ChatGPT has been used, but can they really? Why can’t I ask ChatGPT to alter the style of my essay to prevent detection? I fear natural ability and hard work is no longer enough. I feel sick at the thought of telling my daughter to enlist AI to cheat, but if she doesn’t, will she be left behind?