NewsBite

Why Harvey Weinstein’s conviction was fragile from the start

Why Harvey Weinstein’s conviction was fragile from the start

For years, his lawyers have argued that his trial was fundamentally unfair because it included witnesses who fell outside the scope of the charges.

Jodi Kantor

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

The overturning of Harvey Weinstein’s New York sex crimes conviction this week may feel like a shocking reversal, but the criminal case against him has been fragile since the day it was filed. Prosecutors moved it forward with risky, boundary-pushing bets. New York’s top judges, many of them female, have held rounds of pained debates over whether his conviction was clean.

“I’m not shocked,” said Deborah Tuerkheimer, a former Manhattan prosecutor who is now a law professor at Northwestern University, in an interview. The issue of whether Weinstein’s trial was fair “is a really close question that could have gone either way”.

Loading...

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In North America

Fetching latest articles

Original URL: https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/why-harvey-weinstein-s-conviction-was-fragile-from-the-start-20240426-p5fmrk