NewsBite

Michael Kirby v Geoffrey Robertson on the dismissal and the republic

Michael Kirby v Geoffrey Robertson on the dismissal and the republic

After the release of the Palace Papers failed to settle lingering questions over the Queen’s role in the Whitlam government’s dismissal, two famous lawyers keep the debate raging.

The two famous lawyers disagree over the role the Queen played in the 1975 dismissal of the Whitlam government. AP

Michael PellyLegal editor

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

The release of the Palace Papers last year was meant to settle one of the enduring questions of the 1975 dismissal: was there a smoking gun implicating Buckingham Palace and the Queen in the decision of governor-general Sir John Kerr to sack the Whitlam government?

Perhaps unsurprisingly, it did no such thing. The ardent republicans and Whitlam supporters saw nods and winks from the Queen’s private secretary, Sir Martin Charteris, to Kerr. The monarchists and Coalition supporters were insistent it was all Kerr’s doing.

Loading...

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Michael Pelly
Michael PellyLegal editorMichael Pelly is the legal editor, based in our Sydney newsroom. He has been a senior adviser to federal and state attorneys-general and written two books, one a biography of former High Court Chief Justice Murray Gleeson. Email Michael at michael.pelly@afr.com

Latest In Federal

Fetching latest articles

Original URL: https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/michael-kirby-v-geoffrey-robertson-on-the-dismissal-and-the-republic-20210531-p57wnh