NewsBite

Opinion

Jennifer Hewett

Should the rich have their childcare subsidised?

Labor is promising more money for childcare, arguing it will pay for itself by increasing women’s participation in the workforce. But demands for free universal childcare are not getting traction. 

Jennifer HewettColumnist

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Every family with young children calculates the daily cost of childcare down to the last expensive dollar. Both the Coalition and Labor appreciate this cost is an urgent political, economic and equity issue requiring billions of dollars in annual government subsidies – yet still considered inadequate to the need.

Childcare also turns out to be one of the few policy areas where Labor is happy to differentiate itself from the government by promising to spend more than the Coalition’s current $9.9 billion this financial year. Conveniently, Labor can cite any range of reports – from the Grattan Institute to the Minderoo Foundation to Chief Executive Women to KPMG – to argue extra assistance more than pays for itself, particularly by making it financially feasible for more women to work more days.

Loading...
Jennifer Hewett is the national affairs columnist. She writes a daily column on politics, business and the economy. Connect with Jennifer on Twitter. Email Jennifer at jennifer.hewett@afr.com

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Health & education

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Policy

    Original URL: https://www.afr.com/policy/health-and-education/should-the-rich-have-their-child-care-subsidised-20220505-p5aitr