Opinion
There’s one reason why most finance research is phony
It’s been estimated half the market-beating strategies in leading journals are duds, but it’s only human to construct narratives around events that are random.
Matthew BrookerFinance research is in a difficult moment, after one influential professor estimated that half the market-beating strategies published in leading journals are duds. The academics shouldn’t be too hard on themselves. It’s only human to see patterns and construct narratives around events that are essentially random – as journalists, among others, know only too well.
The doubts swirling around academic finance mirror a broader “replication crisis” in scientific research that dates back to the mid-2000s. If a study’s findings are valid, other researchers should be able to duplicate them. In fields including psychology and medicine, it turns out that many papers don’t pass the test. The same scrutiny applied to financial research has been no less forgiving.
Bloomberg Opinion
Subscribe to gift this article
Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.
Subscribe nowAlready a subscriber?
Introducing your Newsfeed
Follow the topics, people and companies that matter to you.
Find out moreRead More
Latest In Equity markets
Fetching latest articles