NewsBite

'No longer fit for purpose': Suppression debate

Max Mason
Max MasonSenior courts and crime reporter

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

EDITOR'S NOTE: The High Court overturned Cardinal George Pell's conviction for historical child sex offences in a judgment handed down April 7, 2020. In a unanimous decision, all seven High Court judges found Victoria's Court of Appeal should not have upheld Pell's conviction It found the evidence could not support a guilty verdict.

Australia's peak legal body says a debate whether suppression orders remain "fit for purpose" in the era of internet and globalisation is needed after 36 media outlets were cited for contempt of court in coverage of George Pell's conviction for child sexual assault.

Loading...
Max Mason covers insolvency, courts, financial crime, cybercrime and corporate wrongdoing. A Walkley Award winner, Max’s journalism has also received awards from the National Press Club of Australia, the Kennedy Awards and Citibank. Message Max on Signal https://tinyurl.com/MaxMason Connect with Max on Twitter. Email Max at max.mason@afr.com

Subscribe to gift this article

Gift 5 articles to anyone you choose each month when you subscribe.

Subscribe now

Already a subscriber?

Read More

Latest In Media & marketing

Fetching latest articles

Most Viewed In Companies

    Original URL: https://www.afr.com/companies/media-and-marketing/no-longer-fit-for-purpose-suppression-debate-20190327-p5184l