NewsBite

Opinion

Aged care rorts: Australians forced to buy overpriced equipment that’s cheaper at Bunnings

Older Australians are being dudded out of their home care funds which could be better spent so they have more to survive on, argues Julie Cross.

'Stronger aged care': $2.2 billion invested in aged care

When it comes to rorts in the system, let’s talk about in-home care where people are being forced to spend taxpayers money on overpriced equipment, when the same items can be found for less in Bunnings.

Take the case of poor John, 84, who is on oxygen 24/7, and is on a level 3 Home Care Package.

He contacted me after last week’s column on NDIS rorts to tell me about the amount of money the Government is wasting in aged care.

He practically weeps every time he needs to buy equipment and his provider tells him he has to buy it through their preferred supplier - sometimes at 10 times the cost of buying it elsewhere.

Aged care rorts are more prevalent than many might think, wasting money elderly Australians need to survive. Picture: Thinkstock
Aged care rorts are more prevalent than many might think, wasting money elderly Australians need to survive. Picture: Thinkstock

He’d much rather spend his allotted money more carefully, so he has more to spend on actual care, but he’s not allowed.

The first purchase he made via his care provider was a shower chair, which through the approved supplier cost $299.

John found a perfectly suitable one for $30.

He cited another example of a plastic chair listed for $100. The exact same chair could be bought at Bunnings for $25.

Some items are cheaper at Bunnings. Picture: NCA NewsWire / David Mariuz
Some items are cheaper at Bunnings. Picture: NCA NewsWire / David Mariuz

Then he needed a big purchase, a hospital type bed. From the preferred supplier it was more than $4000.

He found one where the only difference was the height couldn’t be changed, but would still suit his needs. The cost for delivering and installing it was $1705.

Meanwhile, of his $107 a day he gets from the Government, $20 of that goes to the provider for admin costs.

That leaves him with $87 a day to pay for a support worker ($74 an hour), or a nurse check up ($148 an hour), of which the provider gets a cut of that too.

John could not afford to save for a hospital bed, so he borrowed the money and paid it back from his pension, which meant he had to skip a lot of meals because he couldn’t afford to eat.

Meanwhile, the aged care providers are laughing all the way to the bank.

Do you have a story about aged care or the NDIS? Send me an email to julie.cross@news.com.au.

Originally published as Aged care rorts: Australians forced to buy overpriced equipment that’s cheaper at Bunnings

Julie Cross
Julie CrossNational Social Affairs Reporter

Julie Cross is the national social affairs reporter for the Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph, Herald Sun, Courier Mail and Adelaide Advertiser. She writes about aged care, child care, women's issues, disability, education, family and consumer trends and immigration. She has previously written for British and Irish national newspapers. If you have a story contact her at julie.cross@news.com.au

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/opinion/aged-care-rorts-australians-forced-to-buy-overpriced-equipment-thats-cheaper-at-bunnings/news-story/4ddaafdc8a86f2b1c6ba4fcf8962aaf5