By Adam Carey
About 30 Victorian councils have banded together to try to stop the mandated rollout of glass-only bins across the state, arguing the $129 million recycling scheme will force a record increase in waste disposal charges to households.
Instead of buying a fourth, purple-lidded bin for each property, the group of councils wants to see the state’s container deposit scheme expanded to include glass wine and spirits bottles, a move that would follow other states.
Climate campaigner John Englart lives in Merri-bek, one of the first Melbourne councils to adopt glass-only recycling.Credit: Justin McManus
All 79 Victorian councils have a deadline of July 1, 2027 to introduce glass-only recycling. Twenty-three councils have already started kerbside collections of purple glass-only bins, and another 16 have a drop-off-only service.
But the Allan government faces growing opposition to the scheme among the 40 councils that are yet to move from a recycling system in which glass is mixed with plastics and paper.
Economic modelling commissioned by 22 of the opposing councils found that the fourth bin would add an extra $27 a year on average per household in waste disposal charges, almost double the state government’s estimate. The councils argue it would also increase truck movements on suburban streets and create storage problems in high-density areas.
Councils that have recently passed motions calling for a pause to the rollout of purple bins include Cardinia in Melbourne’s outer south-east, Manningham, Maroondah and Knox in the city’s east and rural East Gippsland Shire.
The City of Monash has calculated that implementing glass-only bins will cost between $4.5 million and $4.7 million, plus an annual operational cost of up to $2 million.
“The potential funding offered by the Victorian government as it currently stands would cover less than 10 per cent of these costs,” Monash says in a motion to be heard at its Tuesday meeting.
City of Manningham Mayor Deirdre Diamante argued the glass-only bins scheme was poor value for money. The council has already collected 6.4 million containers through the container deposit scheme, and Diamante said the popular scheme should be expanded instead of giving each household a fourth bin.
“You’ve got set-up costs to Manningham of almost $2½ million for glass recycling, and ongoing costs of about $200,000 a year, and how many glass bottles would you probably then put in this bin? For me, it would be a sauce bottle, maybe an olive jar and a wine bottle per week.”
A motion unanimously approved by Cardinia councillors at the shire’s most recent meeting this month argued that the increase in truck movements and household bins carried “potential negative impacts on amenity and logistics”.
“We want to let the Victorian government know that we are not satisfied that this scheme is affordable,” councillor Trudi Paton said.
“We are not satisfied that their scheme is practical, either for additional bins to be placed on the kerbside or for the service to be used as intended.”
The Allan government, which is so far the only state government to introduce glass-only kerbside recycling, has defended the scheme, arguing glass collected through mixed recycling too often breaks and contaminates other material, meaning more recyclables end up in landfill.
Then-premier Daniel Andrews in 2020 announcing the rollout of the purple bins.Credit: Jason South
The mayor of one council that is among the early adopters of purple bins also lauded the scheme’s success.
Merri-bek introduced glass-only recycling in July 2023, and Mayor Helen Davidson said the council had collected 2462 tonnes of glass in the scheme’s first 12 months. Costs to the average ratepayer had risen by $17 a year to help pay for the scheme, Davidson said, which was lower than the opposing councils’ modelling found.
Merri-bek is one of just two inner-urban councils, along with the City of Yarra, that have already introduced kerbside purple bins. Inner-city Port Phillip has opted for a drop-off service. Davidson said some high-density housing areas could not accommodate bins for individual households, but a solution had been found.
“Prior to launching the glass-only collection service, council identified 23 locations in Merri-bek that would have physical limitations for a household to store a fourth bin,” she said. “To solve this, we introduced communal glass drop-off points for about 2000 residents.”
John Englart, a Fawkner resident and the convenor of Climate Action Merri-bek, backed the four-bin system, arguing it reduces the amount of waste entering landfill.
“I’ve seen it as positive because a lot of the glass was [previously] going into the recycling bin, and it’s much harder to recycle when it’s mixed in with all the paper, cardboard, tins, plastics,” he said.
Total Environment Centre’s Jeff Angel says the extra bin is unnecessary.Credit: Rick Stevens
Englart lives in a townhouse and said he was aware that some townhouse residents struggle to find space for four bins, but had overcome this by keeping all four bins to the smaller size.
The Victorian government’s policy to require councils to provide glass-only recycling was introduced in 2020. Queensland, NSW and South Australia have opted to expand their container deposit schemes to include glass wine and spirits bottles.
Jeff Angel, director of the NSW-based Total Environment Centre, said Victoria was on course to be the “one man out”.
“Given the way things are moving, you’ll entrench an unnecessary piece of infrastructure,” he said.
Angel backed the councils’ argument that incorporating wine and spirit bottles into the container deposit scheme was a better solution than a fourth bin.
“Firstly, we have a much better collection and sorting system with container refunds. Secondly, that scheme is much better patronised than a separate glass bin ever will be,” he said.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.