Family considering legal action against police over handling of investigation into Lucille Butterworth’s disppearance
Tasmania Police’s handling of new witness information into the death of Lucille Butterworth has been called a “total stuff-up” and prompted members of the Butterworth family to consider legal action.
Cold Cases
Don't miss out on the headlines from Cold Cases. Followed categories will be added to My News.
TASMANIA Police’s handling of new witness information into the death of Tasmanian woman Lucille Butterworth has prompted members of the Butterworth family to consider legal action.
The Tasmanian model vanished from a Claremont bus stop on August 25, 1969, in what is today marked as the state’s most documented cold case investigation and one that has troubled the Butterworth family for decades.
NEW WITNESS EMERGES WHO COULD HOLD ANSWERS TO COLD CASE
In 2016, Police Commissioner Darren Hine apologised to the Butterworth family over deficiencies in the initial investigation saying “while I cannot explain the actions or attitudes of investigators at the time, I can assure both Ms Butterworth’s family and the Tasmanian community that policing has changed significantly since 1969”.
But members of Ms Butterworth’s family say a breakdown in communication between them and Tasmania Police over information relating to the case is seeing “history repeat itself”.
Witness information was given to police last month by a man, now in his 60s, who overheard a conversation between two men — one of whom allegedly admitted to dumping a woman’s body on Hobart’s outskirts.
The witness claimed the admission came from Geoffrey Charles Hunt, who Coroner Simon Cooper, in 2016, found killed Ms Butterworth.
Despite the coronial findings, there wasn’t enough evidence to charge Hunt — who spent 22 years in prison for the murder and rape of 24-year-old Susan Knight.
Police Deputy Commissioner Scott Tilyard told the Mercury the latest witness information was investigated by police and a man was spoken to in relation to the investigation but “it did not reveal a certain line of inquiry”.
He said he did not know how long the latest witness information had been with police when asked if the statement was in police possession months before the Butterworth family was informed.
Between 2011 and 2015, the case was spearheaded by a team of investigators — Cary Millhouse, Christine Rushton and the now-retired David Plumpton.
Mr Tilyard said the latest line of inquiry was investigated by “experienced people” despite no involvement from those three officers — a police decision that has outraged the Butterworth family.
“It has been a total stuff-up by Tasmania Police,” Jim Butterworth’s daughter Kassie Lee McDiarmid said.
“The police shot themselves in the foot by approaching the latest witness information without the most informed investigators leading the charge,” she said.
She said she was considering suing Tasmania Police over the handling of the investigation.
She said it was hard to watch her father die without the answers he had searched for.
Mr Tilyard said Ms Rushton remained the analyst involved with the case and said Mr Millhouse had been “transferred to another area”.
He said Tasmania Police was committed to keeping the Butterworth family informed about incoming information relating to Ms Butterworth.
Originally published as Family considering legal action against police over handling of investigation into Lucille Butterworth’s disppearance
Top cop’s stern words in cold case search
Police have issued cautionary words to a team of private investigators who are searching for the remains of two girls who disappeared from an AFL match in 1973.
Fresh hope decades after girls abducted
There has been a major development in the search for two girls who were taken from their families in broad daylight more than 50 years ago.