NewsBite

TPC gives Mac Point planning lesson for stadium assessment

The Tasmanian Planning Commission has issued the Macquarie Point Development Corporation a pointed reminder of how the proposed Hobart AFL stadium will be assessed. What they say is missing.

New renders of the Macquarie Point Stadium after Macquarie Point precinct plan accepted by the Australian government and stage one of the precinct plan submitted to the Tasmanian Planning Commission. Picture: Supplied
New renders of the Macquarie Point Stadium after Macquarie Point precinct plan accepted by the Australian government and stage one of the precinct plan submitted to the Tasmanian Planning Commission. Picture: Supplied

The Tasmanian Planning Commission has issued the Macquarie Point Development Corporation a pointed reminder of how the proposed Hobart AFL stadium will be assessed.

The state government has declared the $715m stadium a Project of State Significance, meaning it will be considered by the Commission rather than by the Hobart City Council.

The Commission’s executive Commissioner John Ramsay wrote to the Corporation on November 19 seeking further details so the panel can do its work.

The 12-page letter sought a wide range of information including about transport, planning and financial aspects of the proposal.

“The review of the reports that has been undertaken so far indicates that they do not address

all the matters on which information was sought under the guidelines,” the letter said.

Detailed plans for Hobart’s new AFL stadium reveal an immediate $60m cost blowout, high visual impacts and negative cost-benefit analysis, but mark a significant milestone in advancing the project. The submission of detailed plans to the state’s Planning Commission on Wed signals the end of the phony war over the controversial stadium – and beginning of the real battle by the minority govt to win over critics and parliament, which must ultimately approve it. The blueprint, for a 23,000 seat stadium at Macquarie Point, reveals the cost has jumped from $715m to $775m, a negative $237m cost benefit analysis, and “high impacts” on sight lines from the nearby Cenotaph – the cause of fierce hostility from the RSL. Comes as the Albo signs off on the broader precinct plan, under which the state will build housing, Antarctic wharf and public spaces nearby in return for the feds providing $240m Multipurpose Stadium Hobart. Pictures – Supplied
Detailed plans for Hobart’s new AFL stadium reveal an immediate $60m cost blowout, high visual impacts and negative cost-benefit analysis, but mark a significant milestone in advancing the project. The submission of detailed plans to the state’s Planning Commission on Wed signals the end of the phony war over the controversial stadium – and beginning of the real battle by the minority govt to win over critics and parliament, which must ultimately approve it. The blueprint, for a 23,000 seat stadium at Macquarie Point, reveals the cost has jumped from $715m to $775m, a negative $237m cost benefit analysis, and “high impacts” on sight lines from the nearby Cenotaph – the cause of fierce hostility from the RSL. Comes as the Albo signs off on the broader precinct plan, under which the state will build housing, Antarctic wharf and public spaces nearby in return for the feds providing $240m Multipurpose Stadium Hobart. Pictures – Supplied

The Planning Commission met with bureaucrats from Macquarie Point in late January.

Among the agenda items was “clarification/explanation of matters included in the further information request from the Commission”.

Mr Ramsay wrote again to the Corporation on January 22, again explaining how the legislation governing the assessment works.

“What is to be considered in an integrated assessment is a matter for the Commission, having regard to the provisions of the Act, its scope and purpose, the content of the POSS Order and the Ministerial Direction.

“The combined application of the above determines the extent of matters to be considered as

part of the integrated assessment.

“The effect of the Act is to put other planning instruments aside, in favour of the more general formulation of ‘environmental, social, economic and community issues’.”

A spokesman for Macquarie Point said the process was proceeding normally.

“It is normal for clarifications and further information to be sought as part of the assessment process for a project,” he said.

New renders of the Macquarie Point Stadium after Macquarie Point precinct plan accepted by the Australian government and stage one of the precinct plan submitted to the Tasmanian Planning Commission. Picture: Supplied
New renders of the Macquarie Point Stadium after Macquarie Point precinct plan accepted by the Australian government and stage one of the precinct plan submitted to the Tasmanian Planning Commission. Picture: Supplied

“This is particularly the case for the assessment of large and complex pieces of infrastructure such as the Macquarie Point Multipurpose Stadium.

“This request demonstrates that the Tasmanian Planning Commission is progressing with its assessment, and the assessment process remains on track to be completed in 12 months.

“As part of its assessment the TPC has sought both clarifications and requested additional information.

“The process enables further information to be provided throughout the assessment as required or as appropriate. The Corporation has addressed the majority of the requests received.”

Roland Browne from anti-stadium group Our Place, said the MPDC seemed to be “ignorant of its responsibilities as developer” under the Project of State Significance process.”

Anne Beach CEO Macquarie Point Development Corporation. Macquarie Point Development Corporation significant announcement in relation to the proposed AFL stadium on the site. Picture: Nikki Davis-Jones
Anne Beach CEO Macquarie Point Development Corporation. Macquarie Point Development Corporation significant announcement in relation to the proposed AFL stadium on the site. Picture: Nikki Davis-Jones

“This is extraordinary. It shows MPDC, and State Growth, are completely out of their depth with this project.

“What TPC has told them is what was obvious from the statutory scheme.

“It appears neither MPDC, nor State Growth, have looked at the scheme, or, if they have, they fail to understand it.”

The contract with the AFL requires the stadium for be 50 per cent complete by October 2027 and ready to host matches in the 2029 season.

david.killick@news.com.au

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.themercury.com.au/news/tasmania/tpc-gives-mac-point-planning-lesson-for-stadium-assessment/news-story/929236ca2f2ab50b5ff2259861ee1f1f