Opinion: A toast to Launceston, which is leaving Hobart in the dust
Another day, another battle for the soul of Hobart: the stadium, UTAS’ move from Sandy Bay, the Battery Point walkway, Kangaroo Bay. Civic life is different in Tasmania’s second city, writes Alex Treacy.
Opinion
Don't miss out on the headlines from Opinion. Followed categories will be added to My News.
It’s another day in Launceston.
On Cimitiere Street, the cranes are putting the finishing touches on the new St.Lukes Health headquarters, a seven-storey, $27m timber tower. It looks magnificent.
At Youngtown, new dwellings are sprouting like mushrooms. St Leonards will follow soon enough.
At Mowbray, a series of dilapidated warehouses have come down to make way for the $43.6m Northern Suburbs Community Recreation Hub.
Invermay has been revived. The University of Tasmania’s Northern Transformation Project, the relocation of the campus from Newnham to Inveresk, has been uncontroversial.
It’s not just visible developments changing the face of Tasmania’s northern capital, which, aside from its other many and varied achievements, birthed Melbourne.
A trio of proponents, two local, one global, are planning significant accommodation and mixed-use precincts for unloved corners of the CBD, bringing jobs, investment and tourists.
Launceston’s designation as a UNESCO Creative City of Gastronomy continues to gather momentum, bringing new restaurants, bars, festivals and events.
Sorry, but Launceston is leaving Hobart behind in the dust.
I will show my hand. I am the Mercury’s Launceston and northern correspondent. It is my job to represent and celebrate Launceston.
But every day I am astounded to read my southern colleagues’ endless reports about the incendiary battles being waged for Hobart’s soul.
The UTAS move from Sandy Bay to the CBD. The Macquarie Point stadium. Chambroad’s Kangaroo Bay hotel. The Battery Point walkway. The Northern Suburbs Transit Corridor. The kunanyi/Mount Wellington cable car.
In Brisbane, where I am from, you are defined by whether you live north or south of the river. In Hobart, you’re defined by whether you are for or against a certain proposal.
The differences between the two cities can be seen elsewhere. The City of Hobart frequently loses its way in the long reeds of the culture wars. Launceston’s council is much better at sticking to the ‘three Rs’ – roads, rates and rubbish.
Lest this stray too close to a paean, it must be said that Launceston is not immune to paralysis and blunder – no city is.
Council botched its acquisition of the Birchalls building in the Brisbane Street Mall. It will now have to take a painful haircut as it offloads the asset, while its redevelopment of Albert Hall will come in late and over budget.
JAC Group’s Gorge Hotel has been forced to weather multiple appeals. If it is operational by 2027, as advised by the proponent, it will have taken more than a decade to get over the line.
Capital is rarely that patient.
Tasmania’s culture of no is all-pervasive. Launceston has not escaped its sticky tendrils.
But things happen in the north. Proposals are tabled, debated, refined. Often they proceed. Sometimes they are knocked back.
What doesn’t happen in Launceston is a rush to the barricades whenever a new idea lays siege to the castle.
Hobart draws up the moat and the villagers start bickering. Launceston sends out an envoy and gets to work.
More Coverage
Join the conversation
What Albo needs to do to dodge Trump’s tariffs
Anthony Albanese’s pitch to avoid Donald Trump’s tariffs is simple: we are not ripping anyone off. The President appears to have listened, but the PM has not convinced him yet.
Read more
Weak, juvenile Democrats overwhelmed by Trump
In the first three weeks of Donald Trump’s second term, Democrats seem lost on how to oppose him. Tom Minear assesses their tactics and argues for a simple alternative.
Read more