NewsBite

Adam Creighton

How do you solve a problem like Kamala? Send her to the Supreme Court

Adam Creighton
US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Picture: AFP.
US Vice President Kamala Harris speaks in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Picture: AFP.

Kamala Harris as Supreme Court Justice?

It’s unlikely, but not entirely ridiculous.

Speculation the embattled vice president might be shuffled off to the most powerful court in the land exploded on social media on Wednesday after it emerged veteran Justice Stephen Breyer was planning to retire.

Amid growing doubts Joe Biden will run again in 2024, and Ms Harris’s consistently awful polling, chatter has turned to who has the best chance to succeed Mr Biden as Democrat candidate for president in 2024.

The possibility of a Hillary Clinton comeback is already widely canvassed.

But how to remove the Vice President, a darling of the progressive in the ruling Democrat party, who has the best claim to succeed Biden, without anyone losing face?

“I‘m not going to speak to any considerations,” said White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday, failing to immediately rule out the idea when pressed.

US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is planning to retire. Picture: AFP.
US Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is planning to retire. Picture: AFP.

Right wing media has had a field day with the idea but it was CNN, not known for its anti-Democrat bias, that floated the idea in a searing take down of the Vice President’s office in November last year.

“When they‘re depressed, they bat down the Aaron Sorkin-style rumour that Biden might try to replace her by nominating her to a Supreme Court vacancy,” the report said, after talking to White House insiders.

“That chatter has already reached top levels of the Biden orbit, according to one person who‘s heard it”.

'Fake': social media users mock Joe Biden and Kamala Harris after virtual event

It’s the White House’s push to appoint more minorities to important positions that has fuelled gossip.

Joe Biden appointed Lisa Cook to be the first black woman on the Federal Reserve Board earlier this month.

The President has repeatedly said the first justice he would appoint to the powerful nine-member court would be a black woman, ruling out 93 per cent of the population.

Kamala Harris, a lawyer and former lawyer general of California, the biggest state, would be qualified for the post.

Indeed, the Vice President stressed her administration’s focus on “the most vulnerable” comments only this week: “women and girls; racial and ethnic minorities; LGBTQI-plus people; indigenous people; people with disabilities, migrants, and children in the foster-care system”, in remarks earlier this week.

Happenstance meant Donald Trump appointed three justices during his term, a remarkable windfall for conservatives, given justices can serve until they die.

Donald Trump appointed Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died September 2020. Picture: AFP.
Donald Trump appointed Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died September 2020. Picture: AFP.

Justice Breyer, 83, appointed by Bill Clinton in 1994, frostily dismissed pressure to step down last year, by Democrats who urgently wanted a fresh – and more progressive – appointment to push back against the court’s increasingly conservative bent.

The court is controversially expected to return abortion rights to the states in a decision later this year, in effect overturning almost 50 years of Roe v Wade, which granted universal abortion rights.

The Democrats have a shrinking window of opportunity to leave a legacy on the bench: until November, if they lose control of the Senate later this year.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was replaced by Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Picture: AFP.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was replaced by Judge Amy Coney Barrett. Picture: AFP.

Breyer’s retirement could be the last infusion of new talent for many years. Ruth Bader Ginsberg, who died in 2020, served until she was 87. None of the other justices are over 73.

Biden won’t be able to pick too radically, though, given centrist Democrat senators, such as Joe Manchin and Krysten Sinema, who recently torpedoed his Build Back Better and electoral reform bills, will need to be on board.

With the casting vote in the Senate, where the Democrats have only 50 of the 100 seats, the Vice President herself would need to vote to confirm herself as the next justice.

William Taft, president of the US for a single term until 1913, is the only president or vice president so far to go onto serve on the Supreme Court.

“He loathed being president,” Justice Felix Frankfurter once observed, “and being chief justice was all happiness for him.”

Perhaps Ms Harris, who might not be happy with her national reception, is feeling the same.

Read related topics:Joe Biden
Adam Creighton
Adam CreightonWashington Correspondent

Adam Creighton is an award-winning journalist with a special interest in tax and financial policy. He was a Journalist in Residence at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business in 2019. He’s written for The Economist and The Wall Street Journal from London and Washington DC, and authored book chapters on superannuation for Oxford University Press. He started his career at the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. He holds a Bachelor of Economics with First Class Honours from the University of New South Wales, and Master of Philosophy in Economics from Balliol College, Oxford, where he was a Commonwealth Scholar.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/kamala-harris-for-the-supreme-court-dont-laugh-it-might-happen/news-story/39584fd6f21e2dacac6233d7de1895d8