Iran has eased demands to revive nuclear deal, says US

Washington will shortly to respond through EU mediators after 18 months of indirect diplomacy that weeks ago was on the verge of collapse.

IAEA director-general Rafael Grossi last June demonstrates how a monitoring camera used in Iran operates. Picture: AFP

The US said overnight on Tuesday Iran had agreed to ease key demands that had held up the revival of a 2015 nuclear deal, with all eyes on what President Joe Biden in turn is offering.

The US is expected shortly to respond to Iran through EU mediators, after a year and a half of indirect diplomacy that weeks ago was on the verge of collapsing.

US officials said Iran dropped demands to block some UN nuclear inspections after also relaxing on insistence on a key sticking point – that Washington remove its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps from a terrorism blacklist.

“Gaps still remain, but should we reach an agreement to return to the deal, Iran would have to take many significant steps to dismantle its nuclear program,” a senior official in the Biden administration said.

Mr Biden has supported returning to the accord trashed by former president Donald Trump and Iran has pressed hard in negotiations in Vienna. But with Iran also claiming diplomatic wins, the US official insisted that Tehran ultimately “made concessions on critical issues”.

Iran had sought to shut down a probe by the International Atomic Energy Agency into three undeclared nuclear sites where the watchdog says it has questions related to nuclear work that has since ended. In June, Iran disconnected a number of IAEA cameras after the UN body’s board censured Tehran for not adequately explaining previous traces of uranium.

The senior US official said Iran would again face “the most comprehensive inspections regime ever negotiated” with monitoring “for an unlimited amount of time”. But Henry Rome, deputy head of research at the Eurasia Group, said Iran had not conceded on the undeclared sites.

“I don’t think anyone should be surprised if this issue comes up again at a later stage of these negotiations,” Mr Rome said.

The recent progress came after the EU put forward a draft agreement to Iran. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell told Spanish public television TVE that Iran sought adjustments to it but that “most” countries agreed.

Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia are also party to the agreement, formerly known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

The US official insisted that accounts of new compromises by the Biden administration were “categorically false”. But Suzanne DiMaggio, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said both sides had had to show flexibility to come as far as they have.

“Neither side will want to admit that, but the reality is that in a high-stakes negotiation, especially between adversaries, making tough compromises is the only way to get to an agreement,” she said. “If both sides feel confident that they can frame the outcome as a win, chances are the JCPOA will be restored. If not, the road ahead looks rocky.”

She said Mr Biden was in a strong position after legislative wins and had an incentive, amid high tensions with Russia and China, to avoid a nuclear crisis with Iran.

But Mr Biden faces heated opposition from Mr Trump’s Republican Party as well as Israel, which campaigned against the agreement when it was reached under former president Barack Obama. Mr Trump imposed sanctions on Iran in hopes of bringing the US adversary to its knees. Its economy suffered but the Biden administration contends the main result was to accelerate Iran’s nuclear work.

In a letter to Mr Biden, the top Republican on the House of Representative foreign affairs committee complained the administration had left congress in the dark. “The only logical conclusion to draw is that Iran’s negotiators are pleased with the outcome of negotiations, while US negotiators are still determining how to make further compromises and best sell a bad deal to the American people,” Representative Mike McCaul wrote.

A EU official earlier said Iran had agreed to defer discussion on ending Mr Trump’s terrorist black-listing of the Revolutionary Guards, the clerical regime’s elite ideological unit. Among ideas reportedly under consideration are for the US to maintain the terrorist designation but not to punish dealings with the Guards, who have wide interests across the Iranian economy. The return of the US to the accord would mean an end to Mr Trump’s unilateral sanctions on Iran selling its oil, potentially easing further energy prices that had soared after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

AFP