20 years after Iraq invasion, US moves to end war authorisation

Senators from both parties have strongly supported cancelling the 2002 Authorisation for Use of Military Force.

Baghdadis celebrate the toppling of a statue of Saddam Hussein on Firdos Square in April 2003. Picture John Feder

Almost exactly 20 years after US forces invaded Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power, the US Senate moved on Thursday to revoke the law that authorised president George W. Bush to launch the war.

In a procedural vote that came more than a decade after the war’s official end, senators from both parties strongly supported cancelling the 2002 Authorisation for Use of Military Force, which empowered Mr Bush to send US forces to Iraq.

The bill also revokes the 1991 AUMF that empowered Mr Bush’s father, president George HW Bush, to attack Iraq after Saddam’s forces invaded Kuwait.

“The Iraq War has itself long been over. This AUMF has outlived its purpose and we can no longer justify keeping it in effect,” Democrat Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer said. “Every year we leave these AUMFs on the books is another year that a future administration can abuse them.”

The 2002 AUMF has been mostly moribund. But, because it allows the president to order a response to any actions seen as threatening to Iraqi democracy, it has been used to justify several actions in the past decade, such as allowing US troops in Iraq to retaliate against Iran-allied militias that have fired rockets at bases housing US troops.

Most notably, it was cited in the January 2020 US assassination in Baghdad of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, ordered by Don­ald Trump. Because of that, there have been fears a president could use the AUMF to go to war with Iran, citing a threat from Tehran to Iraq, said Scott Anderson, an expert in national security law at the Brookings Institution. “The biggest risk it presents is that people will use it more broadly”, beyond congress’s original intent.

Since the beginning of his administration in 2021, President Joe Biden has urged congress to revoke the 1991 and 2002 AUMFs.

But the legislation – which could come next week to a final vote in the Senate and then be sent to the House of Representatives – does not take action against the 2001 authorisation of war in Afghanistan. That authorisation, with broad powers for the president to order military force against Al-Qa’ida and its offshoots, has been used to carry out actions in numerous countries.

In a statement on Thursday, the Biden administration said the President was ready to work with congress to replace other “outdated authorisations for the use of military force” with “a narrow and specific framework more appropriate to protecting Americans from modern terrorist threats”.

AFP