NewsBite

Super League: From insiders’ Zoom briefing to public debacle in five days

At a Zoom meeting on Friday the media officers from six Premier League clubs were stunned at what they were being told. They knew they were walking into a huge PR disaster.

Football supporters demonstrate against the proposed European Super League outside of Stamford Bridge in London. Picture: AFP
Football supporters demonstrate against the proposed European Super League outside of Stamford Bridge in London. Picture: AFP

At a Zoom meeting on Friday the media officers from six Premier League clubs were stunned at what they were being told.

Katie Perrior, a former Downing Street spin doctor, and Richard Conway, a former BBC journalist turned sports PR specialist, informed them that negotiations for a European Super League (ESL) were at an advanced stage and their teams were to be its founding members. “We knew we were in for a tsunami of shit,” said one.

Another said: “The fact that there was no CEO and no spokesperson was a concern. Not only that, the actual strategy wasn’t very sophisticated. It was basically, ‘It’s going to be a rough ride but we have to hold firm.’ Basically there was no comms strategy.”

On the same day, Manchester City and Chelsea, who were wavering, were given an ultimatum: sign up now or you will miss the train, and there will be no getting back on. Reluctantly, they agreed, pushed in the end by the fear of handing clout to their fiercest rivals, Manchester United and Liverpool.

European Super League on brink of collapse

Perrior, a former adviser to Theresa May and Boris Johnson, founded the PR firm InHouse and it was selected by the ESL to handle communications in anticipation of a huge political fallout.

By Sunday morning news was spreading fast. Mark Bullingham, chief executive of the FA, made contact with a government minister and asked to speak to the prime minister as soon as possible. The Premier League board held an emergency meeting in tandem with other European leagues.

Just after 1pm The Times broke the story that six of England’s Premier League clubs had signed up to the ESL.

The Premier League prepared a strongly worded letter from the chief executive, Richard Masters, to be sent to all 20 of its clubs, calling on the rebels to abort their plans to join the breakaway league immediately. A statement was issued on Sunday afternoon.

Nothing from the ESL was released until late that night and even then the clubs involved did not, as usual, put the announcement on their social media feeds. By Monday opposition had become strong and universal.

Players at the six English clubs were already deeply concerned. Chelsea’s chairman, Bruce Buck, held a meeting with their squad. A similar meeting happened between Manchester United’s stars and Ed Woodward, the executive vice-chairman and one of the main co-conspirators behind the ESL.

United’s players expressed their dismay with Woodward and stressed that they did not like the sound of a closed league – the 15 founding clubs could not be relegated whatever their performance. Chelsea’s players were alarmed by the threats from Uefa and Fifa that anyone participating would be banned from international football.

Senior figures at the six English clubs were stunned by the ferocity of the response in the media, from fan groups and especially from the government.

Liverpool FC was among the clubs to receive a fierce backlash from fans. Picture: AFP
Liverpool FC was among the clubs to receive a fierce backlash from fans. Picture: AFP

When the Duke of Cambridge joined the opposition, anxiety started to spread among the rebels. By Monday night, sources said, at least two clubs were having serious misgivings.

Conversations between executives at the six clubs started to pass to colleagues at the 14 excluded ones – as well as contacts at Uefa, the FA and the Premier League – showing that the owners and senior figures behind the breakaway were stunned by the response. It was said that they underestimated the depth of feeling and the anger they had provoked.

The Times received a call shortly after 9.30am on Tuesday to say that Manchester City and Chelsea were “wobbling”. This appeared to be known among senior figures at the Premier League, the FA and Uefa.

At Liverpool the players called a meeting, following comments made on Sky by their manager, Jurgen Klopp, and the midfielder James Milner, the previous evening and agreed that they were united in opposition against the plan. It was agreed then that players, most notably the captain, Jordan Henderson, would support Milner in voicing their opposition to the Super League on social media.

By this time the 12 Super League clubs who had been named had called an emergency meeting, which started on Tuesday afternoon and lasted for hours. The English clubs expressed their concerns but were reminded of the threat of litigation if they broke a legal agreement committing them to the group for the next three or four years. Separate to that, there was also a 23-year commitment to the competition. Separate meetings were taking place within the respective clubs.

All the while, the attack on their plans continued, with Johnson telling football officials and fan groups it was time to drop a “legislative bomb” to not only stop the breakaway but ensure it never happened again. The six clubs were stunned by the speed and force of the prime minister’s reaction.

Tottenham fans protested the proposed move. Picture: AFP
Tottenham fans protested the proposed move. Picture: AFP

At Chelsea and Manchester City a sense of panic was developing. What good work they had achieved was about to be undone by a huge PR disaster.

During an emergency meeting of the 14 excluded clubs, Brighton and Hove Albion’s chief executive, Paul Barber, revealed that he had spoken that day to Daniel Levy, chairman of Tottenham. Barber had worked at Spurs as their commercial director and been a senior figure at the FA. Barber said that Levy, normally unshakeable, was seriously rattled by the reaction, not least from his club’s own fans. The clubs, meanwhile, called for individual sanctions against Woodward and the other main architects of the Super League.

City had been shaken by the news that hundreds of fans had returned their memberships on the back of supporters groups across the “big six” issuing statements. Of further concern to Chelsea was the sight of fans demonstrating outside Stamford Bridge before their game against Brighton. The scene turned ugly until the fans learnt of the club’s decision to quit the ESL.

The news broke via the media at about 6pm. A decision, it is understood, was taken to pull out while the meeting of the 12 Super League clubs continued. Concerns about possible legal action meant there was no official statement, but within minutes Manchester City announced they were out.

This got praise from Uefa and the FA in the form of public statements, and was followed by news, at about 7.45pm, that Woodward had resigned. Woodward was taken aback by the outrage and felt that his position was untenable. An official release from United, with a statement from Woodward that did not mention the ESL, landed at 9.20pm.

By then the other four English clubs had agreed that they too would officially withdraw from the breakaway group. Only Arsenal issued any form of apology, although Liverpool’s co-owner John W Henry delivered a personal apology in a video yesterday (Wednesday) morning and Joel Glazer, co-chairman of United, apologised later.

The Times

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/the-times-sport/super-league-from-insiders-zoom-briefing-to-public-debacle-in-five-days/news-story/5d1c0d5886fa6cb52e04115293d43a80