NewsBite

LIVE

Politics latest: Climate task will get harder beyond 2030: Kennedy

The Treasury secretary says uncertainty surrounding climate policy has done significant damage to the decarbonisation effort, driving up transition costs.

Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Martin Ollman
Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Martin Ollman

Welcome to The Australian's rolling coverage of news from Canberra and around the country.

Live Updates

Climate task will be harder beyond 2030: Kennedy

Treasury Secretary Steven Kennedy says the uncertainty surrounding climate policy in Australia has done significant damage to the decarbonisation effort, undermining trust among business and the community while driving up transition costs.

Australia had policies in place to achieve its 43 per cent emissions reduction target by 2030 and was on track to achieve it, but Dr Kennedy warned that “implementation risks remain”.

“Beyond 2030, the task will get harder again. Achieving net zero by 2050 will require a further round of policies to drive the necessary emissions reductions in harder to abate sectors. New technology breakthroughs will be critical to achieve this,” he said.

There was unlikely to be a consensus on a market carbon pricing mechanism so most governments were instead pursuing a suite of policies, comprising market mechanisms, regulations, incentives, subsidies and tax expenditures to drive decarbonisation.

“There are real challenges in ensuring such approaches deliver the most efficient transition but nonetheless they can be effective in driving the needed transition, if well designed,” he said.

The comments were made in a speech unpacking the national interest framework that will underpin the government’s flagship Made in Australia policy, and which the government has committed to legislating later this year.

Delivering the keynote address at the United States Studies Centre’s conference in Sydney on Wednesday, Dr Kennedy said the national interest framework’s “net zero transformation stream” would allow the government to identify the domestic sectors best able to contribute to emissions reduction at an efficient cost and in areas of long-term comparative advantage.

Dr Kennedy said the most obvious area where Australia had a role to play at the global level was “in the supply of critical minerals” essential to the decarbonisation effort.

“Australia is one of only a few countries around the world with the natural resources, industry expertise and trusted trading relationships to fill this role,” he said.

“China controls 40 per cent of the world’s rare earth element reserves, accounts for 69 per cent of mined production and around 90 per cent of processing,” he said. “Even where its reserves are relatively modest, such as with nickel, it still accounts for around 28 per cent of global processing, and more, once ownership of foreign assets is considered.”

Dr Kennedy said this meant that the ability to respond to a supply shock was limited and that its consequences would be significant.

“This makes the arguments for government intervention compelling,” he said. “Importantly, this is not a situation where classic trade theory can, or should, be applied in a simplistic or naive manner.”

Treasury boss warns of risk of 'poorly targeted policies'


Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Martin Ollman
Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Martin Ollman

Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy has warned there is a “heightened risk of poorly targeted policies, creating inefficient industries, propped up by taxpayer support” if government interventions aimed at building economic resilience were not subject to effective policy guardrails.

He said the use of economic and financial tools to “promote and defend national interests” meant governments were under increasing pressure not to leave key parts of the economy to the private sector and instead establish strong protections around a growing number of critical activities.

Known as the “small yard, high fence” approach, Dr Kennedy noted there was a tendency to keep increasing the height of the protective fence and the number of economic sectors being assisted through some form of government support.

He noted that, in September 2023, the government more than doubled the number of critical infrastructure assets deemed to be systems of national significance, adding a further 87. When the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act was introduced in 2018 it had initially only covered four sectors – including electricity, gas, water and ports.

“I am not arguing that these decisions were unwarranted. I am only seeking to highlight the immense pressure that policy makers are under to expand the ‘yard’,” he said. “There is also an ever-present risk that these types of regulatory regimes could be used as a quasi-form of industry protection or to respond to community pressure, rather than to address genuine security risks.

“This is why our partnership with security and intelligence agencies, including as part of the foreign investment screening process, is so important.”

Dr Kennedy said there should be a “high bar” for what the government opted to put inside the protective fence or the “yard” and “each decision should be carefully weighed, with both benefits and costs considered”.

In the keynote address to the United States Studies Centre conference in Sydney on Wednesday, Dr Kennedy said national security had collided with economic security and helped to turn government “inside out and upside down”.

“We are facing a more contested, more fragmented and more challenging global environment,” Dr Kennedy said. “Where trade is increasingly seen as a vulnerability as much as an opportunity. This is further complicated by the urgent need to decarbonise the global economy.“

He said this was the context for the government’s flagship Future Made in Australia policy, but noted policymakers needed to “strike a fine balance”.

“If we fail to adequately adapt and respond to the new reality we face, we risk exposing our economy and our country to excessive risk or missing important growth opportunities,” he said. “If we over-correct and adopt a zero-risk approach, shutting ourselves out of global markets and seeking to be overly self-sufficient, we will quickly undermine the productivity, competitiveness and dynamism of our economy.”

If the latter outcome was realised, it would ultimately be “self-defeating”.

The comments from Dr Kennedy come after the government was criticised for some of the early investment decisions it unveiled as part of its Made in Australia agenda. These included a $1bn investment in the Solar Sunshot program to claim a larger stake in solar panel manufacturing supply chains and a $1bn taxpayer funded investment in a world first quantum computer in Brisbane.

Dr Kennedy cited Jim Chalmers' recent Lowy Institute speech to clarify that the Future Made in Australia scheme did not mean pursuing self reliance in all things.

“Doing so would simple undermine our key economic strengths and leave us less, not more able, to exercise strategic weight,” he said.

Allegra Spender: neither party good enough

Teal MP Allegra Spender, when asked which party she was more likely to support in the House of Representatives in the case of a hung parliament in the next election, said “policies of … neither parties I think frankly are good enough”.

“I’d say the Coalition's policy at the moment is extremely problematic, because I think it's not going to deliver on the science and what we need to do … actually trying to avoid the natural disasters and the impact on our kids,” Ms Spender told The Australian's Energy Nation Forum.

“I think the Coalition has, you know, there is obviously a bigger gap.”

However, Ms Spender did not indicate which way she was more likely to provide confidence.

“But for me, this is about negotiation if it ever comes to that, because that's what my community is interested in, they're pretty business focused, and they're very environmentally focused, they say we have to deliver on the science we have to deliver on the economy,” she said.

'Challenges' to promise of $275 power bill cut

Energy and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen has noted international challenges when asked at The Australian's Energy Nation Forum whether he would drop the $275 power bill cut promise pledged before the last election.

“Every modelling is an exercise,” Mr Bowen said.

“We've had the outbreak of the war and the impacts that would have.

“We're not walking away from our ambition to reduce energy prices by getting more renewables into the system.

“And we are seeing the impacts now of getting more renewables into the system and the gas caps that we have to put in place as a result of the war in Ukraine

“It's not the answer to all those problems, but it is showing the direction of travel, that for the first time in a long time, energy prices are coming down. That's a good thing. We've recognised the need to do more. Hence the $300 rebates.”

Bowen slams Coalition's nuclear plan

Energy and Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen says it is "a furphy" that the world is moving to nuclear energy, while slamming the Coalition's plan and its lack of costings.

“I hear this said, the rest of the world is doing nuclear,” he told The Australian’s Energy Nation Forum. “Well actually the world is adding more renewable capacity every couple of weeks than it is doing in a year in nuclear.

“It’s a furphy to say that the world’s moving to nuclear.

“My objection to nuclear has never been moral – for some people it is, not for me … it is a practical, evidence-based rejection for Australia.”

Mr Bowen has slammed the Coalition’s nuclear energy plan for which more details were released today, saying it “does not survive contact with analysis or reality”.

“Let’s be generous and call it a policy,” he joked.

“No costings, no modelling, not even a number of megawatts … and haven’t even confirmed that they’ll release those things pre-election. They say ‘in due course’ when asked whether it’ll be pre- or post-election.

“If we did that in opposition, you would tear us apart and … our credibility will be shredded on the front page, not just of your newspaper but at the others as well.

“By the way, as of today, this policy was released a couple of hours ago, as we speak today, six of those seven sites the owners have said those sites are not available.

“So the policy fails at the first hurdle before we get to costs or deployment if the owner of the site is not willing to make that site available.

“I'm not being flippant when I say … it does not survive contact with analysis or reality.”

Cheng Lei blocked from second media event

Sky News Australia journalist Cheng Lei has described the moment she was denied entrance to a second press event with Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Opposition leader Peter Dutton by a media staffer for the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, after being told she “wasn’t on the list”.

This was despite, she wrote in a first-person piece for Sky News, being registered by her bureau chief a week earlier.

It was the second snub Cheng had faced that day, with repeated attempts by Chinese officials to block her from view during a historic joint press event with Anthony Albanese and Chinese Premier Li Qiang earlier.

She described the bizarre scenes in her own words, saying “For a moment it reminded me of being in RSDL (Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location) where shifts of two guards were glued to me every minute of the day.”

Cheng went on to detail that while she was in the foyer waiting to enter the second Dutton-Li press event at 4.20pm, a Chinese woman and man, who she referred to as Brown Coat and Blue Suit, “were talking to the PM media staff. I then heard the words among themselves in Chinese: ‘This is our turf, we can veto it’.”

She said she learnt “Blue Suit” was the most junior at the embassy and on his first overseas posting.

These were the same people who repeatedly manoeuvred in an attempt to prevent Cheng from being captured by news cameras at the first Albanese-Li event.

Burns slams 'dangerous escalation' of attacks

Jewish Labor MP Josh Burns has called out the "ugly behaviour" and "escalation" of political debate that led to an attack on his electorate office in Melbourne, and has made a plea for it to stop before someone gets hurt.

"It was clearly politically motivated by having the graffiti on the outside of the office. This was really ugly behaviour. It was dangerous and it put residents' lives and livelihoods at risk and the police are investigating … and we'll let them do their work," he said at a press conference on Wednesday afternoon.

"I want to remind people what the office actually is and what it is there to do. My staff are there to look after their community; to provide access to government and government services, whether it be the NDIS, whether it be immigration, visa issues, Centrelink, whatever it is, my team are here to help.

"And at the moment … they can't be in the office, it's not safe in the office, it's still a crime scene. And it's a reflection of eight months of my team turning up to work and being abused and being screamed at, and I've got really good people working for me … who have no role in a conflict on the other side of the world. And their place of work has been smashed in by really dangerous idiots," he said.

"And it's a reflection of the sort of conduct of political debate right now. We're in Australia … We're in multicultural Melbourne.

"This isn't respectful right now. This is a dangerous escalation of people trying to bring a conflict on the other side of the world to our street, and it needs to end and it needs to stop, because it's dangerous.

"And thankfully no one was hurt last night but next time, I'm worried for my colleagues, I'm worried for my staff, I'm worried for people involved in political life in Australia."

He said he was "nervous about it escalating even further" and about someone getting hurt or worse.

Mr Burns said he was "desperate for this war to end" but this was just an escalation of violence in Australia.

"What happened outside my office caused distress to my staff, my team, my community. It didn't bring about peace in the Middle East … No amount of aggression and violence here in Australia is going to change what's happening in the Middle East," he said.

"I'm desperate for there to be a ceasefire, I'm desperate for there to be an agreement where hostages are returned home, and Palestinians can return to rebuilding their lives and getting on living a life of dignity and respect and freedom, but it's happening on the other side of the world."

Dutton won't commit to pre-poll nuclear costings

Peter Dutton has declared he is going to the next election seeking a mandate from the Australian people on nuclear power, but has not committed to releasing details on cost before voters go to the polls.

The Opposition Leader rejected criticism that the Coalition’s nuclear plan had not been costed, arguing that plans to rely on green hydrogen had also not been sufficiently examined and dismissing the concerns as stemming from “green millionaires”.

“There is some investors out there, some green millionaires who have huge investments, their portfolios are heavily invested into green energy is renewable energies, and so they will be concerned because we are not offering them the chance to invest in this, we want this to be a national asset,” he said.

“I'm not interested in lining the pockets of rich green millionaires. I want to bring down the price of electricity for average mums and dads if we look at the international experience … as we know, electricity is cheaper where there is a presence of nuclear energy.

“That is the fact. So we can rely on the international experience.

“In relation to the issues around the Senate, we are going to the next election seeking a mandate from the Australian people, very clear mandate that we want support to modernise our energy system … which is about economic growth and jobs for decades and generations to come.

“That's the mandate that we seek, and that's the mandate that I believe that we will act on the Parliament and we will work with the premiers in a constructive way as we know in NSW, that is already a nuclear state.”

Burns attack 'despicable and dangerous': Frydenberg

Josh Frydenberg has called on the nation's political leaders and law enforcement to do more to protect the community from anti-Semitic attacks like that on the electorate office Jewish MP Josh Burns.

The former treasurer and proud Jewish Australian described the attack on the St Kilda office as "despicable" and an example of "mob rule".

"The attack on Josh Burns' office was despicable and dangerous and one that requires more than words of condemnation," Mr Frydenberg told The Australian.

"What we need is more action from our political leaders and law enforcement to protect the community.

"Our leaders must step up and wrest control back from the mob. A mob that has had free rein since October 7 to act in a violent, hateful and un-Australian manner.

"It is after all not just the Jewish community that is under attack, it's Australia’s social cohesion that is under attack and the very values that underpin it.

"This is Australia’s fight and it’s a fight we must win."

Dutton welcomes 'referendum on nuclear'

Peter Dutton has declared he is happy for the election to be a “referendum” on energy and nuclear power, challenging the Labor party to run a scare campaign about the safety of nuclear technology after they supported the AUKUS submarines.

The Opposition Leader said he was not deterred by safety concerns some voters living near the proposed sites may hold, arguing that the technology is safe, adding that without a “credible energy policy, you have no economy”.

“I'm very happy for the election to be a referendum on energy, on nuclear, on power prices, on lights going out, on who has a sustainable pathway for our country going forward,” he said.

“As I said before, this Prime Minister has no vision for our country, because he can't manage the government on a day-to-day basis.

“And we have been very honest, open and transparent with the Australian public.

“This technology operates around the world and it is safe, or the government wouldn't have signed up to it under AUKUS.

“I would just say this, would a Prime Minister sign up to an AUKUS deal using this nuclear technology to propel the submarines and to have our members of the Australian Navy on those submarines 24/7 if he thought or she thought that the technology was unsafe? No.

“So you don't even hear the Labor Party talking about technology being unsafe.

“Would the Prime Minister have signed an agreement with the United States and the United Kingdom which requires Australia to dispose of the waste from the submarines and the reactors at end of life if he thought, or she thought, that it wasn't safe to do so? No.

“And so, the government has signed up in that circumstance, and the Premiers have agreed to those submarines being constructed and worked on maintenance cycles in South Australia, in Western Australia. So let's have a mature debate about each element.”

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/politics-latest-labor-to-introduce-laws-to-break-up-cfmeu/live-coverage/b619573bda2ee641cbab503f9a451aec