Jim Chalmers defends increasing Jobseeker payments for only one group
Jim Chalmers has sought to defend the government’s reasoning for only increasing welfare payments for one group of Aussies.
Peter Dutton has called for a reinstatement of the contentious “work for the dole” program.
With next week’s budget set to confirm the fortnightly Jobseeker payment will be increased for 227,000 recipients aged over 55, the Opposition Leader said it was time for a broader conversation.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers would not be drawn on the JobSeeker “speculation” ahead of next Tuesday’s budget, but said being selective with Jobseeker increases would mean the most vulnerable Australians more likely to struggle to find employment would have additional support.
Mr Dutton said the decision to raise the rate only for some recipients highlighted the broader need for the budget to “juggle” a persistently too-high inflation rate.
More broadly, he said he was concerned there were people on the payment who weren’t “legitimately looking for work”, and said there was a “great argument” for bringing back the work for the dole program.
“I think there is a great argument for bringing back the program and others... that say to people - you’re unemployed, you’re able to work, and there’s work out there. So why aren’t you in a job?” he told 2GB.
“And the benefit that you reap from a program ike Work for the Dole means that it provides an incentive for people to move off the dole into work, which is a better life for them.”
Defending the government’s decision to limit a JobSeeker raise to only older Australians - despite a review panel recommending a “substantial” increase to the whole of “seriously inadequate” payment – Dr Chalmers said there were valid reasons.
“The Jobseeker payment already makes a distinction between workers closer to the aged pension – older workers. It already pays a different rate at the moment for people over 60, and that’s in recognition that it is harder to find a new job at the end of your working life,”
he told ABC Radio.
“Second point is related. All of the expert advice says that the group most likely to be long-term unemployed is people over 55, and that group is dominated by women. That is the most vulnerable part of the unemployed population.
“The third one is that no government can satisfy all of the calls for more spending in the budget, even from people and from groups whose views we welcome and respect. It’s not possible to satisfy all of the calls … particularly at a time when we’ve got persistently high inflation and structural deficits.”
He said the age of 55 was the recommendation of the Women’s Economic Equality taskforce and the Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee.
Dr Chalmers said the government had included a comprehensive cost of living package in the budget, including measures that are “not determined by age”.
“The overwhelming priority for the government is to provide this substantial cost of living relief in a way that prioritises the most vulnerable,” he said.
There is likely to be reconsideration of a broader payment raise in subsequent budgets.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said Dr Chalmers had to balance the “juggling act” of inflation still not in control.
“Anything the government does to increase inflation will mean that interest rates will remain higher for longer,” he told 2GB.
“It’ll mean that families will continue to struggle. And we know that a lot of families at the moment just don’t know how they’re going to pay the bills – so that’s what the government has to weigh up.”
Mr Dutton said he was concerned that there were people on the Jobseeker payment who weren’t “legitimately looking for work” and there was a “great argument” for bringing back the work for the dole program.
“A program like work for the dole provides an incentive for people to move off the dole into work, which is a better life for them,” he said.
War will end when Israel’s foes stop attacking it
Hamas began hostilities on October 7 when it invaded southern Israel and began slaughtering and kidnapping Israelis. Only an evil or foolish leader would start a war. But nations are entitled to defend themselves against attack.
Australia is not the same country — but too many are in denial
Since the October 7 attacks, Australian values have been traduced. What is happening affects the entire country and the collective impact is profound.