NewsBite

commentary
Greg Sheridan

Coronavirus: There can be no backdown in face of Beijing trade baloney

Greg Sheridan
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison meets with President Xi Jinping during the G20 in Osaka, Japan on June 28, 2019. Picture: Adam Taylor/PMO
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison meets with President Xi Jinping during the G20 in Osaka, Japan on June 28, 2019. Picture: Adam Taylor/PMO

Beijing’s decision apparently to destroy our barley exports to China, and to cut our beef exports there, constitutes naked economic coercion and intimidation.

There is no doubt they are linked to Canberra’s call for an independent inquiry into the origins and spread of COVID-19.

But there is a background of other actions by Canberra which Beijing does not like and which form the atmosphere for this ­unprincipled intimidation.

The imperative here is for the Australian government to hold its nerve, not to back down on any issue of substance, but at the same time to keep the rhetoric as low key and unemotional as possible.

The government, and all its senior ministers in their public statements, have chosen for the moment to accept Beijing’s assertions that these trade actions are indeed trade actions and not geopolitical retaliation for general policies that Beijing doesn’t like.

That is baloney of course, but the government is right to accept this fiction, publicly at least.

The premium here is on firmness of Australian action, not volume of Australian rhetoric.

It would serve the political interests of Beijing for Australia to conflate and inflame the disputes. It is reasonable for the government to take Beijing at its word and simply point out the manifest unfairness and baseless nature of its trade actions.

Illustration: Johannes Leak
Illustration: Johannes Leak

The Communist Party of China runs a socialist state in which foreign investment is strictly controlled, access to its domestic market strictly controlled, many Chinese companies given credit below cost and subsidised to capture strategic market share abroad.

For that system to accuse Australian agriculture, renowned as one of the least subsidised sectors in the world, of “dumping” — selling products below their cost of production — and other unfair trade practices, is ludicrous.

It is so absurd as perhaps to qualify as a rare example of communist humour.

Beijing is in an extremely ­aggressive mood all round the world, with military actions in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, utterly implausible conspiracy theories against America and at times bizarre diplomatic aggression in Europe.

This is a deliberate decision by the Chinese government to go down an ultranationalist path.

Many nations have been subjected to Chinese trade retaliation in the recent past.

Beijing has generally been slow to do this kind of thing with Australia, partly because the two-way trade relationship is so beneficial to China, as well as to us.

It is also possibly the case that when Beijing felt it could make bigger, sometimes covert, political gains within Australia it was a little more restrained.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison meets with Vice President of the People's Republic of China r Wang Qishan in Jakarta, Indonesia in October, 2019. Picture: Adam Taylor
Prime Minister Scott Morrison meets with Vice President of the People's Republic of China r Wang Qishan in Jakarta, Indonesia in October, 2019. Picture: Adam Taylor

There is a serious possibility that this trade intimidation marks a stage of punishment and hostility which Beijing now intends to inflict on Australia for some time.

No Australian government is perfect but there is absolutely nothing in all this over which the Morrison government deserves serious criticism.

Beijing has a lot of trouble understanding democracies but the Morrison government is assuredly not responsible for the tone on China taken by non-government commentators.

Similarly, it is too simplistic a syllogism to say that good relations are in Australia’s interest, ­relations are currently bad, therefore the Australian government must be at fault.

Not only is this logically wrong, it grants all power to Beijing to ­determine when an Australian government is at fault.

The Morrison government’s instinct: maintain the substance of your position; protect Australia’s interests; use neutral language where possible, is right.

That approach gives you the best chance of safeguarding the national interest. It doesn’t guarantee success. Neither does any other approach.

Greg Sheridan
Greg SheridanForeign Editor

Greg Sheridan is The Australian's foreign editor. His most recent book, Christians, the urgent case for Jesus in our world, became a best seller weeks after publication. It makes the case for the historical reliability of the New Testament and explores the lives of early Christians and contemporary Christians. He is one of the nation's most influential national security commentators, who is active across television and radio, and also writes extensively on culture and religion. He has written eight books, mostly on Asia and international relations. A previous book, God is Good for You, was also a best seller. When We Were Young and Foolish was an entertaining memoir of culture, politics and journalism. As foreign editor, he specialises in Asia and America. He has interviewed Presidents and Prime Ministers around the world.

Add your comment to this story

To join the conversation, please Don't have an account? Register

Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout

Original URL: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coronavirus-there-can-be-no-backdown-in-face-of-beijing-trade-baloney/news-story/1984e399fde291717f08cf52abbba35a